Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 1, 1995 PAGE 5 <br />The council deliberated the newly adopted cul-de-sac code, and the confusion of whether or not <br />either proposal meets the new code due to the two different density zones, which creates an <br />unusual circumstance. The original preliminary plat submitted was placed on the board next to <br />the revised plan for comparison and review. Mr. Beutel asked if the property to the west could be <br />served from Hwy 5, and City Engineer Bohrer replied highly unlikely. <br />M/S/P Hunt/Johnston - to approve the original preliminary plat, dated June 9, 1995, of Beaut <br />Crest Estates, (with the revision to Lot 6, Blk 2, to comply with the code), and grant a variance to <br />the maximum length of a temporary cul-de-sac based on the unusual circumstance for the <br />northern most street which runs east and west (labeled Street A), with the following conditions: 1 <br />The wetland delineation shall be reviewed and approved by the Valley Branch Watershed <br />District. 2. The stormwater detention facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the Valley <br />Branch Watershed District and City Engineer. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted <br />and approved by the City as regulated by the landscape ordinance before final plat approval. <br />Additional landscaping shall be provided along State Highway 5. This shall be approved by the <br />City Planner. 4. The park dedication in -lieu fee shall be established before final plat approval. 6. <br />All comments from the City Engineer in his letter, dated July 6 and July 10, 1995, shall be <br />completed before final plat approval. (Motion passed 4-0.) <br />C. CASE NO. SUBIV/95-23 Consideration of Preliminary Plat known as "Eagle Point Creek <br />Estates". Applicant: Jon Whitcomb <br />[The City received an application from Jon Whitcomb for the subdivision of a 33.24 acre parcel of <br />property, owned by Howard Michels, and located north of Stillwater Blvd., east of the NSP Power <br />Lines, South of the Railroad Tracks. The property is in the RE - Residential Estates Zoning <br />District. The proposed plat is 16 lots, ranging in size from .143 acres to 8.93 acres, with a <br />variance consideration to the lot length to width ratio on Lot 6. At its June 26 meeting, the <br />Planning Commission held a public hearing for consideration of the plat, and discussed the lot <br />ratio of Lot 6 needing a variance to the standard. The Planning Commission recommended <br />approval with variance to the lot ratio of Lot 6, at its July 10 meeting. The council received copies <br />of the preliminary plant with relevant data, a revised City Planner Staff report, City Engineer's <br />report with recommendation.] <br />City Planner Terwedo reviewed preliminary plat, staff report and findings. Tim Freeman, Folz, <br />Freeman & Dupay Surveying, ran down the issues as he sees them: Mr. Freeman does not <br />believe Lot 6 requires a variance according to his interpretation of the ratio standard, however, he <br />configured the lot for the best use of the land. Lots 1 & 2 will share a driveway, although a <br />neighbor is concerned about safety and want two separate drives, however, he has followed the <br />County's recommendation. According to the DNR the permit for the bridge is transferable to the <br />new property owner, and all that's needed is the deck and an inspection. The Amoco letter, <br />which requests a "Warning!" sign (with specific language) mark all of the plans will be complied <br />with, and finally, Mr. Freeman stated he has no problem with any of the conditions recommended <br />by the Planner and Engineer. <br />