My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-05-95 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1995
>
09-05-95 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:28:41 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:30:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 5, 1995 <br />M/S/P Hunt/John - to direct the city engineer to work with Washington County in the design of Inwood <br />Avenue to see if a portion of the water could be diverted from the west side to the east side of Inwood <br />Avenue probably through a 15" culvert which costs would be included in the County's project for <br />reconstruction of Inwood Avenue. (Motion passed 5-0). <br />Request from Ed Abbott for fireworks display: <br />Ed Abbott, 3600 Kelvin Avenue N, requested permission for a onetime use of fireworks on his property of <br />28 acres, Saturday, September 9th, by a pyrotechnic who is licensed by the State. Attorney Filla <br />explained the city does have the authority to regulate the use of fireworks, and if the city chooses, it could <br />allow this to occur in the city if there is a licensing procedure for it. Currently, the city code does not allow <br />a display of fireworks within the city. The ordinance would have to be changed to allow this use to occur <br />and it is not the kind of activity you could grant a variance to and waive the provisions of the city code. <br />Discussion occurred and Mr. Abbott was informed that the city's regulations do not allow the use of <br />fireworks on his property. The Council decided it was too short of a time schedule to change the code <br />allowing this type of use on September 9th, but Mr. Abbott did get the procedure started for the Council to <br />discuss the appropriateness of changing the code allowing fireworks. <br />"Due to conflict with the City Engineer's schedule resulting from the holiday, his report will immediately <br />follow Public Inquiries <br />5. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: <br />A. Update on visit to Upper 33rd St. regarding 1995 Overlay <br />Larry Bohrer reported he and the Mayor met with the Markgrafs and Dunns out on the site of the 33rd St. <br />proposed paving project. There were two issues discussed; the paving of the westerly gravel portion of <br />the road itself and the proposed construction of a turnaround. At the conclusion of the meeting, it was <br />generally agreed that the residents, Markgrafs and Dunns, would accept the paving of the gravel portion <br />of the road up to the westerly end of the Markgraf's driveway, but eliminate the T-turnaround. Also, the <br />reflective signage needs to be upgraded by Public Works because of deterioration. Bohrer added that <br />even though paving stops some 30-40' short of where the barricade is now, Public Works will need to <br />plow all the way to keep the fire lane open. <br />M/S/P Johnston/DeLapp - to approve the modification agreed upon on Upper 33rd St.; that is, to pave the <br />gravel portion of the road up to the westerly end of the Markgraf's driveway and to eliminate the T- <br />turnaround (Motion passed 5-0). <br />B. Hill Trail N./Hill Trail Court Drainage Problems <br />Larry Bohrer was asked by the City Administrator to review the drainage patterns in the area with the <br />Council because of certain requests of property owners. He reported there are two affected property <br />owners, Furseth and Brown, with high water problems. The Public Works Dept. has pumped that wetland <br />occasionally when the water has reached high levels. Before the mid 1980's, there were two catch <br />basins and a pipe at the intersection at Hill Trail Court and Hill Trail. This would intercept some of the <br />street drainage from these two streets and direct it to Lake DeMontreville. In the mid 80's, the owner of <br />the property, Castle Design, wanted to try to develop this parcel of property and discovered a storm <br />sewer out across their property without the benefit of an easement to discharge water across that lot. It <br />was requested and granted that the water discharged be stopped; therefore, the two catch basins were <br />fitted with a steel plate over the grate and paved over so they could no longer accept water and transfer <br />water across property. The Furseths and Browns believe that by closing off the catch basins it has <br />contributed to the high water problems in the wetland. Bohrer agreed that closing of the catch basins <br />may contribute to the high water, but certainly doesn't cause the problem. This water problem was <br />identified in a report identifying various flooding concerns done by the previous engineer in 1978. The <br />residents, Furseth and Brown, have asked if the city would investigate reopening of that drainage facility. <br />Bohrer asked if the city would like him to make contact with the new owners, the Taylors, to see if there <br />would be an objection to reopening those catch basins.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.