Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 18, 1996 4 <br />M/S/P Hunt/John - to call a public hearing for July 2, 1996 for modifying requirements of antenna towers <br />not to exceed 65' in height for placement on existing water towers within the City (Motion passed 5-0). <br />Attorney Filla reviewed the changes in the draft agreement with SBA, and Mr. Howey will be bringing this <br />agreement to his attorney for review. Larry Bohrer will review the site plan, which was received by their <br />office at the end of day, with Dan Olinger. <br />M/S/P Hunt/Conlin - to approve PCS site agreement with the City and Sprint Spectrum concerning <br />placement of PCS antennas on City water towers contingent upon the City successfully amending its <br />code to allow antennas on water towers of suitable height. (Motion passed 5-0). <br />Councilman Hunt suggested securing a copy of the League of Minnesota Cities antenna ordinance and <br />ask the Planning Commission to work on where in the City should we accept antennas and free standing <br />towers. <br />M/S/P HunttJohn - to direct the staff to contact the League concerning placement of free standing PCS <br />towers and get their model ordinance and direct the PZ to begin discussions as per policy on the zones <br />where antennas are permitted, and have the proposed ordinance be placed on the first PZ meeting of <br />July and request a recommendation back to the Council at their second July meeting. (Motion passed 5- <br />0). <br />7. CITY ENGINEER'S R REPORT: <br />A. PUBLIC HEARING: CSAH 13 Reconstruction Project <br />The Public Hearing was published in the June 5, 1996 Stillwater Gazette Extra and the June 3, 1996 <br />Stillwater Gazette. All benefiting property owners were notified. <br />Washington County has ordered the improvement of CSAH 13 (Inwood Avenue) from CSAH 6 (Stillwater <br />Blvd.) to CSAH 10. In accordance with County cost participation policy, a portion of the cost is <br />chargeable to the City. This street improvement provides a benefit to those properties which front on <br />Inwood Avenue. Larry Bohrer explained the policy states that the abutting property shall be assessed <br />based on zoning category. The Council set the appropriate rate for each zoning category for the 1996 <br />Reconstruction Projects. <br />Mayor John opened up the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. in the Council Chambers <br />Mary Siedow, 2796 Inwood Avenue N., felt he was not going to benefit $1200 by this road reconstruction <br />and was told at a meeting by Chris from Washington County that the property owners would not have to <br />pay. The shopping mall in Woodbury is the one benefiting and should be crucified for this. <br />Paul Eberhard, 2298 Inwood Avenue N. agreed the County did not mention any cost assessed to <br />residents, asked if there will be interest charged on his 3 lots where the assessments are being deferred. <br />This is a hearing for ordering the improvement and assessments will be discussed at a future <br />assessment roll hearing. <br />Mayor John closed the public hearing at 8:22 p.m <br />Councilman DeLapp questioned the County has a driveway off of Inwood Avenue and use it for dog and <br />horse trials. It is not a City approved driveway, but do they have an obligation to be assessed for this <br />access. When the road project is being done, they should be upgrading the driveway to City standards. <br />The staff will check with the County on blacktopping the driveway to City regulations. <br />