01-20-98 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M/S/P Hunt/DeLapp — to direct the City Planner, City Engineer and Mayor to attend the meeting on the Corridor Plan for T.H. 36 on February 11, 1998, 3 p.m., at the Washington County Public Works Building conference room. (Motion passed 5-0). 5. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License for Oasis Market Twin Cities Stores; Inc., (Oasis Market), has submitted their application for a non -intoxicating off -sale liquor license. The City received their certificate of insurance and their liquor license fee of $150. M/S/P DeLapp/Dunn - to approve the 1998 Non -Intoxicating Off -Sale Liquor License for the Oasis Market located at 11025 10`" St. N.; conditioned upon approval by the Washington County Sheriff and County Attorney. (Motion passed 5-0). B. Meeting with Met Council A special meeting has been called for Wednesday, January 21, 1998, 6:30 p.m., City Council Chambers, to discuss the PCS Ordinance (Wireless Telecommunication Tower) and to review with Met Council staff the Regional Blueprint Plan with some emphasis on I-94 Corridor and relating planning issues. This meeting will be cabled and go out live. 6. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:None 7. MAINTENANCE/PARKS/FIRE:None 8. PLANNING. LAND USE, AND ZONING: A. Countryside Wood Products On August 20, 1996, the City Council continued the application for a 7,500 sq.ft. Woodworking shop/office building located at 8603 N. 34"' Street. The applicant, Walt Pechan, agreed to this continuance. Planner Terwedo stated in her August 20, 1996 staff report, there was a drainage issue, and the applicant needed to direct his storm water runoff northeast instead of southeast because the property owner to the south would not grant him the easement. Variances are needed to lot size, lot depth requirements, front building setback, rear parking setback, and front parking setback. A Conditional Use Permit is needed for the woodworking/office building. The applicant has received a utility permit from MnDOT, and a Valley Branch Watershed permit has been issued. The staff was directed to review the following items: 1. Office computation versus parking demand. 2. Applicant stated building is 10,000 sq.ft., which is the maximum allowed for the 2.5 acre site. The building includes offices and 14 employees. Should the building size be prorated for a smaller lot than allowed by code in the Limited Business District? 3. Are the building materials allowed by code for this district? Are these the materials we want to see on I-94? 4. A list of hardships, stated by the applicant, is needed. Applicant stated he has submitted a letter listing his hardships, but it was not included in the packet received by Council. 5. Councilor DeLapp asked the City Attorney to review the hardships presented and offer his comments. 6. Storage/warehouse is not allowed in Limited Business. Should we state inside storage is not allowed in the CUP? 7. Clarification of footprint of building is needed. Would like updated drawing of what is being proposed so to review impervious surface coverage calculation and parking requirements based on the new footprint. 8. Is a drainage easement required for the outlet pipe from Tauer and/or Anderson referred to as Condition #8 in staff report and referred to in Tom Prew's letter of 5/8/97? This issue needs to be identified. If an easement is needed, it should be filed with the City. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 20, 1998