Laserfiche WebLink
2. Planner Dillerud explained concept of development of a use intensity approach <br />allowing PF uses in some Ag and residential zoning districts. <br />M/S/P DeLapp/Siedow — to authorize the City Planner, when he sees fit, to introduce to the Planning <br />Commission the concept of development of a use intensity approach allowing PF uses in some Ag and <br />residential zoning districts as a possible alternative. (Motion passed 5-0). <br />The Council reviewed the April 22, 1999 PF DRAFT and made the following modifications: Page 8, Item <br />5. Parks - ...spectator capacity for community playfields. ; d. Buffering ....minimum depth of 200 feet is <br />required., ...parcel of record; <br />Jeff Roos, McCombs Frank Roos Assoc. representing Apostolic Church, Jay Sleiter, President of BWBR <br />Architects, Charles Palmer, Lakewood Evangelical Free Church, showed different site plans that would <br />meet the regulations of the proposed PF ordinance and compared those illustrations based on church site <br />design suggestions by B WBR Architects. <br />City Planner Dillerud commented there are no current applications for site plan review, and he is <br />uncomfortable with the Council asking questions on the site plans that have not been applied for and in <br />some sites have not been zoned PF. <br />Peter Beck, Doherty, Rumble, and Butler, asked the City to take away the three barriers, 15 acre size, 200' <br />buffer, and 35% impervious surface coverage to allow more flexibility of design solutions. Berming and <br />planting can accomplish the same result as a buffer. Existing features of the land would be maintained. The <br />churches want to preserve natural amenities and the rural character of the community. A maintenance <br />garage is not a church. A church has a different impact. Beck asked for reconsideration of the new <br />ordinance. If River Valley Church wanted to expand, it would be considered non -conforming and have to <br />comply with the new PF ordinance and request variances. <br />Attorney Filla indicated the regulations are not infringements on religious beliefs. The city has verified that <br />churches are allowed in business zones. The city has to allow churches in town and the regulations do so. <br />Some of the existing churches have outgrown their sites. The comp plan recognizes churches as a potential <br />land use in the community and encourages the use. <br />Administrator Kueffner pointed out that Mt. Zion Church and River Valley Christian Church were located <br />in individual buildings that were zoned General Business confirming that churches (religious uses) are a <br />permitted use in the General Business Zone. <br />The consensus of the Council was agreed by the staff, at a future date, to deal with their concerns on how <br />the City would handle existing public facilities with respect to rebuilding following damage from a natural <br />disaster or future enlargement in the existing sites. <br />Each member of the Council was polled as to favorable modifications to the PF Zoning: The Council <br />indicated the following: Siedow is in favor of considering larger maximum lot size, consideration of <br />impervious surface with removing the buffer zone, Hunt is in favor of larger lot size with smaller surface <br />coverage and slightly increase in buffer zone; Armstrong is willing to look at a 20 acre site including the <br />buffer; Dunn would consider allowing parcels larger than 15 acres and has a concern on impervious <br />surface coverage, Delapp would consider larger acreage if impervious surface coverage is lowered to that <br />of the surrounding uses. <br />M/S/P Armstrong/Dunn strong/Dunn — to direct the staff to make changes to the PF Ordinance for June 1" Council <br />meeting based on discussion of the Council and information heard on the ordinance to fulfill the desires of <br />the Council. (Motion passed 5-0). <br />9. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: None <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 4, 1999 <br />