My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-21-99 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1999
>
12-21-99 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2025 11:39:43 AM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:42:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Captain Johnson and Captain McGlothlin of the Washington County Sheriff's Department agreed with the <br />need for traffic control on Highway 36 and DeMontreville Trail and other areas deemed necessary. With <br />events such as this, off -duty deputies are hired for the job and the cost for hiring off -duty deputes would be <br />borne by the promoter of the event and/or the Springborns. <br />Mayor Hunt stated in order to restrict snowmobiles in the area the City would have to adopt an ordinance to <br />ban snowmobiles because now they are able to run in the ditches. There is also no parking in the area. <br />Commercial recreation of a rural nature is granted in the Springborn CUP, and the permit allows tube slide <br />operation, activities at the chalet, and paddle boats on the lake, only. <br />Attorney Filla explained a commercial rural use is a conditional use in a rural zone and is not defined in the <br />code. This permit, years ago, was an attempt to define what that term means to that property. There is a <br />process for amending this permit. If you want to allow this event to occur, which does require notices, <br />technically has not been done in this case. This parcel includes only the activities stated in the CUP.You <br />would have to ask the applicant to submit a site plan, determine what is needed to protect our roads if a <br />traffic problem comes up. More specific planning and details need to be laid out to decide what is <br />permissible and what is not permissible; such as, rules of operation. Some organizations will benefit, you <br />would have to ask what the balance would be. If the Council decides a snowcross is encompassed as a <br />Commercial Recreation of a Rural Nature and is included in the current Green Acres CUP, then we don't <br />have to be here. If the use is not allowed by the CUP, then we have to follow amendment process and <br />define the terms as it relates to the property. <br />Administrator Kueffner explained the Springbom's and their promoter asked if they would have to amend <br />their existing CUP to do this one time. They did not want to jeopardize their existing CUP for something <br />they were uncertain of. Mayor Hunt responded there are no complaints against the existing CUP so there is <br />nothing jeopardizing this CUP. <br />Council members Siedow and DeLapp agree that it's written in black/white in the CUP that a snowcross <br />snowmobile event is not allowed, and based on our ordinances, we cannot allow this request. <br />Michelle Bruette stated the petition is ill gotten because it was stated, if approved, this event would be <br />permitted every weekend. <br />Katherine Brown stated she agrees with the route the Council is going <br />M/S/P DeLapp/Hunt - to deny request of Springborn Green Acres for a two day Snowcross event to be held <br />on February 26 and 27 based on its inconsistent with the intent of Commercial Recreation of a Rural <br />Nature. An existing permit for Springborn green acres defines uses allowed onsite, proposal by applicant <br />requires amendment of permit, text change of zoning code. (Motion passed 2-1-1. DeLapp, Hunt, Against: <br />Armstrong, Abstain:Siedow.) <br />Speeds on Hwy 36: Capt. McGouthlin shared the Council's concern on speed on Hwy. 36 Enforcement is <br />not the sheriff's primary responsibility ... more of them, than there is sheriff s deputies. <br />C. Meyer's Pineridge Final Plat <br />The Preliminary Plat for Meyer's Pineridge was approved by the City Council on October 19, 1999 and <br />will have 21 new single family detached lots and 1 existing home. All lots will be at or near one acre with <br />individual septic systems. Planner Dillemd reported the Final Plat drawings, construction plans and other <br />Final Plat documentation comply with Chapter 300 and Chapter 400 submission requirements and the <br />approved Preliminary Plat. <br />The Developers Agreement was prepared by the City Attorney and is of the same format used for the <br />previous OP projects except: <br />1. Administrative fees payable to the City for project processing are now 2% of the original project cost <br />($4,132) payable before plat release, not escrowed, and <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 21, 1999 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.