12-02-80 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 2, 1980 Mayor Armstrong called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Councillors in attendance: Mottaz, Morgan, Pott, and Novak. Also present Administrator Whittaker AGENDA: Additions: Review of the 201 Schedule, Direction of Business Climate in Lake Elmo, District 834 Advisory Committee, Animal Control Contract, Support for VBWD on 3M Grant for 1006. Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to approve the Agenda as amended. Motion carried 5-0. MINUTES: October 21, 1980 - Armstrong moved, seconded by Morgan to include the approved changes submitted by Al Lehman, 3M, in the October 21 minutes. Motion carried 5-0. November 18, 1980 and November 24, 1980 -.Approval tabled until December 16, 1980, meeting. CLAIMS: Morgan moved, seconded by Armstrong to approve Claims 80878 thru 80975. Motion carried 5-0. ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER CONTRACT: The Animal Officer prefers to keep the contract on a six month"renewal basis. Mottaz moved, seconded by Novak, to renew the Animal Control Officer Contract with Jerry Dahlberg for the period of January 1, 1981 to June 30, 1981. Motion carried 5-0. TRI-LAKES LETTER: The Council reviewed the letter from Dick Murray, Tri- Lakes Association. The City had requested the Association define their boundaries; but noted they changed their by-laws to include only those residents within 100 ft. of a lake rather than 1,000 ft. The Administrator will write the Association stating the City did not intend they change their by-laws; but, only define the boundaries of the Tri-Lakes area for the Association. He will also ask them to discuss Civil Defense Sirens at their annual meeting. COMP PLAN AMENDMENT PROCEDURES: The Met Council wants the City's comments on the new procedure by December 11. Any comments or concerns should be submitted to the Administrator before the llth, and he will forward them to the Met Council. LAWRENCE E. LANZ: Shoreland Permit at 8311 Windbread Trail - Mr. Lanz is requesting a Shoreland Permit to add fill to expand his driveway. The Engineer has reviewed the site and reported that the proposed elevations are above the minimum building elevations and not in the flood plain. He recommended that any disturbed area be sodded or reseeded after construction so that the fill does not erode into the pond or lake. Morgan moved, seconded by Mottaz, to grant a. Shoreland Permit to Lawrence Lanz, with the provision that the sloped area along the driveway be stabalized with sod or seed and mulch to prevent erosion. Motion carried 5-0.