My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2010/01/25 (2)
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
Minutes - 2010/01/25 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:23:47 AM
Creation date
7/12/2010 2:50:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
1/25/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 25, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />cooperatively and if the time is split differently, those budgets will have to be adjusted as well. • <br />Council Member Stigney stated that previously this was a one-half time position that did not pay <br />benefits and he would prefer hiring two half-time positions rather than one three-fourths time <br />position that pay benefits. <br />Council Member Hull asked if this position would receive benefits. Clerk-Administrator Ericson <br />stated the position would receive pro-rated benefits and he agreed it might be difficult to attract a <br />qualified employee if the position is half-time without benefits. <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson noted the resolution just authorizes the position to be advertised and <br />explained there are efficiencies with having just one employee and flexibiliry is afforded between <br />the two departments since this employee can address situations that may arise for both <br />departments. <br />Council Member Gunn stated she would go along with one employee at three-quarter time. <br />Finance Director Beer advised that additional time is budgeted in the summer time for Code <br />Enforcement. <br />Council Member Mueller stated she was at iirst intrigued by having two one-half time positions <br />but after considering available equipment, computer system, and transportation, she thinks one • <br />person is adequate. <br />Council Member Hull stated he was at first interested because health care costs continues to <br />increase but thinks the long-term consistency gained with one employee may outweigh other <br />benefits. <br />Finance Director Beer stated that the Salary Compensation Study identified this position was <br />grossly underpaid so including modest benefits will allow the City to recruit and retain quality <br />candidates. <br />Mayor Flaherty stated support for one employee, which may also reduce the turnover rate. <br />Council Member Mueller stated if some of the PSO duties cannot be fulfilled by this position, <br />then it falls to a sworn officer who is paid a higher rate than Step l. However, duties in Code <br />Enforcement could fall to an interim that is paid at a lower rate. She noted it worked out well <br />last summer to have the intern help with Code Enforcement. <br />Council Member Stigney stated the big picture is to look at expenditures and that provides a <br />different perspective. He reviewed some of the job duties to be performed, noting this is a part- <br />time position and while a half-time person is needed in the Police Department, the same is <br />needed for Code Enforcement. He again suggested looking at two half-time positions to avoid <br />payment of benefits. • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.