My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2007/03/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
Minutes - 2007/03/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:24:03 AM
Creation date
7/20/2010 9:33:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/12/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 12, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />this is an after the fact permit request due to the fact that Staff did not communicate to Mr. • <br />Harstad that he needed such a permit. <br />Director Ericson read from the Code listing what constitutes the requirement to obtain a wetland <br />alteration permit. <br />Director Ericson indicated that in working with Rice Creek and the City's Staff the criteria were <br />reviewed as listed in the Staff report and all appear to be satisfied and Staff finds no basis to deny <br />this tree removal permit. <br />Director Ericson explained that any other planned work would need another alteration permit to <br />be reviewed by Council. <br />Dave Tillman of 5166 Longview Drive addressed Council and said that they realize that this will <br />occur and it states that nothing else shall occur. He then provided a picture taken two hours ago <br />of fill that was dumped after the trees were removed. <br />Director Ericson said that there is new dirt on the site after the trees were removed. <br />Reed Hiltman of Longview Drive said that he is irritated with the process and thinks that the City <br />should be more proacrive rather than reactive to ensure that other developers do not do the same <br />thing and ask for a permit after the fact. <br />Director Ericson said that Staff is working with the City Attorney on Chapter 1010 of the Ci 's • <br />~3' <br />Code to clarify some of the language in it concerning enforcement to ensure the City is in a better <br />position to follow up on willful disregard in the future. <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff can attempt to ascertain where the fill came from and will <br />ask Rice Creek to follow up if there is no permit from Rice Creek. Staff would need to consult <br />with the City Attorney to determine what type of recourse is available. <br />Martin Harstad of 2191 Silver Lake Road explained that they have not placed any fi11 on the <br />property and have not done any grading. They did grind stumps outside of the wetland but not <br />within it and only removed trees. He then said that if someone did place fill then he would <br />request that they be prosecuted because no one has been given authorization to place fill. He <br />further said that no one that he is associated with has dumped any fill on this site. <br />Council Member Mueller asked whether the originally submitted tree removal plan was <br />followed. <br />Mr. Harstad said he requested that the dead trees that were blown down in addition to the trees <br />listed for removal be taken. He further explained that the storm that happened devastated the site <br />and he requested that the dead fall be removed <br />u <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.