Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 14, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />Director Lee indicated that is before and noted that there is a 10% contingency figured in as well. • <br />Council Member Flaherty asked whether the 10% would bring the project to within the budgeted <br />amount of $185,000. <br />Director Lee said that it should. He then said that Staff has discussed this with Spring Lake Park <br />and they are receptive to working on this with the City. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Stigney. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 7085, <br />Approving the Feasibility Report, Ordering the Project, Authorizing the Preparation of Plans and <br />Specifications, and Approving a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Spring Lake Park for <br />the 2007 Seal Coat Project. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />D. ~ <br />r''~°-~~~° ~ e~~A4e~~'~e~~ '"-~.'~-•~ze.-Item Deleted <br />E. Resolution 7077, Approving an Abatement of Nuisance Code Violations <br />Associated with the Property Located at 5232 Skiba Drive <br />Housing Inspector Anderson explained that Mr. Olin, the property owner was issued citations for • <br />nuisance code violations. He was just beyond the appeal period when he requested an appeal and <br />that is why this is before Council. <br />Inspector Anderson explained that there is exterior accumulation of debris in the yard and <br />outlined the history of the nuisance issues with this property. <br />Mr. Olin addressed Council and said that there were some personal matters that caused these <br />issues. He then said that he deflated the pooi and that got rid of the standing water. He further <br />said that the piles of debris were removed by a hauling company. <br />Inspector Anderson explained that in the packet of information there are several impact <br />statements from surrounding properties indicating the situation at the property for the last few <br />years. Mr. Olin did get a dumpster that has been removed but he has not been out there within <br />the last week to determine whether things were removed. <br />Inspector Anderson informed him that he will need to get a fence permit since a fence is being <br />constructed. He then said that this fence will not allow this situation to continue just because it is <br />screened. He further said that he would recommend postponing or tabling to allow Staff to look <br />into the situation. <br />Council Member Flaheriy said that he drove by the property and was told by neighbors that a lot • <br />of progress has been made in the last two weeks. <br />