Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council September 24, 2007 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br />Mr. Sonterre would like the document left as Staff has suggested, because the Council can say to • <br />a resident who says that the information was not provided that it was, and point out what page it <br />was on. <br />Council Member Stigney asked for clarification and information on the community fund balance. <br />Interim Administrator Ericson indicated that the community fund balance will be verified with <br />the Finance Staff. <br />Mayor Marty indicated that the document should be amended to reflect that the amount would <br />fluctuate based on home values established by Ramsey County. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he would like to postpone the public hearing. <br />Mayor Marty said he would like to leave the public hearing in place, and noted Council does not <br />have to take action at that meeting. <br />Mayor Mariy said that he would also like to have the document available at the library as well as <br />the other locations listed. <br />Director Lee reviewed the proposed changes to the document with Council as was discussed. <br />Council Member Mueller would like to leave trail information in the document. • <br />Council removed the walkways. <br />Councii amended the document to reflect that the value af a home affects the amount you pay. <br />The document was changed from 18 years to IO years for the program length. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that he would like the information on the previously assessed <br />properties clarified, because Council has not decided how ta handle it. The date was removed <br />and the words "canceled after proj ect initialization" were added. <br />Attorney Riggs indicated that an assessment cannot just be cancelled. The process needs to <br />involve a reassessment. Attorney Riggs recommended removal of the sentence regarding the <br />previously assessed property information. Attorney Riggs indicated that the language is not legal <br />as suggested and should be removed. <br />Attorney Riggs said that the language should be clarified quite a bit, and suggested adding "upon <br />further review being conducted by the City." <br />Mr. Sonterre indicated that the Task Force was informed that it would be possible to refund <br />previous assessments but, of course, they would be in support of any change that needs to be ~ <br />made due to the legalities of the process. <br />