Laserfiche WebLink
Cecen ber 13, ln7r, <br />Page <br />Stu Rothgeber, 5 "1') reenfic1d, stated that whey n cluded those four <br />lots to the south because it's difficult to upgrade the zoning and if <br />they find a use for it they could go ahead. }!e stated that they do <br />not i ntcnd to put townhouses in there hecause they know this ►iroul d <br />never. i.?ori. Rothgeber stated that if this is going to be a big <br />7rol.lem the Council could del o_te those four ''lots from the request. <br />n <br />n <br />t,tarney Meyers explained that the developers would have to brin.5 <br />lans`and enter into a development "contract. On the lots to the <br />orth that are to be owner- occupied, the developer would have to <br />,..hat those individually. Mr.' Rothgeber stated that he understood <br />this. Attorney "Meyers also explained that the Council could give <br />a conditional rezoning which could be conditioned on the developer <br />bringing in tho plans within ;gn days or it would revert back to-the <br />original zoning. `1r. Gustafson stated that the Planning Commission <br />suggested they be given six months, <br />Mayor Pickar asked for comments fro,► the residents. <br />Gary ,Sward, 7544 Greenfield, stated that no one talked to him about <br />this development proposal. <br />John Brown, 753O Greenfield, stated that he was not contacted either. <br />He stated that he did not like the idea of having townhouses just <br />behind his house on four lots. <br />Gary sward stated that the }1clui res, who live on the south end, are <br />ill tonight and couldn't cor.ie but they have not been contacted either.` <br />i1r. "Rothgeber. stated that they were here tonight because of a petition <br />which was signed by 5 of the abutting land owners. <br />Attorney Meyers explained that they were here on a request to rezone <br />and they needed a petition to qualify for the hearing. <br />Administrator Achen read the petition. <br />Helen Houle, 7543 Edgewoo-1, stated that they were contacted, but <br />they were told the proposal was for two -three unit buildings, or <br />six units. She stated that she dic, not sign the petition. <br />Councilmember Baumgartner asked if the people that signed the petition <br />were 'aware that the request was no' for nine u; ►its instead of six. <br />Ir. Rothgeber asked if this really mattere. ';ounci 1°,►en,2er 3aumgartner <br />stated that if he had signed t'1 o 'eti ti on it mild Natter to him. <br />Administrator Achen reviewed th >eople t'let signed 7etition. <br />There were 5' of the asjoining Jroperty owners that sinned the <br />petition so it did meet the ordi nai1ce re iui rcments. T1 s petition <br />allows this clatter to '''a consi within r Months of Wien the <br />rezoning was originally denied. <br />Mayor Pickar stated that since t'l2 "or.li ng of the petition has been <br />changed he did not kno if this es a 1 e3al heari n ",ttorney <br />"eyers ex'lained that t',e petition granted them t'ie. right to have a <br />hearing and th, ''ounci 1 wall d 'have to loci d2 on t'►, w:i j "t the_, <br />