My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1976/12/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
Minutes - 1976/12/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:47:16 PM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:24:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
12/13/1976
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
December 13, 1976 Page 5 <br />giant to give to the language in the petition. <br />Mr. Si'ard pointed out that there vas net one signature on the petition <br />frori any abutting home eowners. The petition was signed by commercial <br />property owners and the apartment owners. <br />Mayor Picker asked if the hone owners had Le.en talked to and an <br />agreement arrived at. Mr. Rothgeber stated that he talked to <br />Dick 'iosman, who represented the home owners. <br />Dick 'iosman, 795 Greenfield, stated that he and mr. Rothgeber did <br />talk but did not agree upon anything. He stated that this is not <br />the first time there has been a conflict in the application and pre- <br />sentation. The Council has made suggestions to the petitioners but <br />they keep coming back with the same thing. Mr. Mosman stated that <br />he did not intent to commit his neighbors in any way. He had said <br />that he would discuss any agreement he and `1r. Rothgeber reached with <br />his neighbors but they didn't reach an agreement. 'ir. Mosnan <br />suggested that the Council reach some kind of a compromise since <br />the developers would not loose that much none;; by reducing the units <br />somewhat. The property abutting the single family hones could be <br />developed into hones too. <br />Mr. Rothgeber stated that the City spent many dollars for the <br />comprehensive plan which shores this area as a medium density zone, <br />which has been construed to be six unit buildings. <br />Mayor Picker stated that he hoped something could be done that is in <br />agreement with the homeowners. The comprehensive plan does show that <br />area, as medium density hut the Council must also consider the health, <br />safety and welfare of the adjacent nronerty owners. <br />Mr. Gustafson stated that the Plannine Commission ap�roved town- <br />houses over that whole area, not single family houses. Councilmember <br />Shelquist stated that this matter "as before t"e Planning Commission <br />on November 10. Mayor Pickar stated that the Planning Commission <br />approved the concept, of owner occupied townhouses on Lots 4 7, but <br />an R zone does not require owner occupied. There would have to be <br />a special use permit. <br />John nrown stated that if the Commission had seen plan.; <br />showing si ig1a fa,lily .ialli i s ,robaL1_ 0Ad have approved <br />it. Councilnet:ber �i lq�isf a <br />"losfian stated Mat Vic conipre)ensi v? )l an is not iii ndi nd, it <br />is just sugg°stions that the co'inci1 nay want to take into consideration. <br />Mayor Pi clear state net it was !aoru than this !ecaa3e it was ado )t d <br />by t' c City and it is t,i a ouaci 1 ';as loci tied to develop the <br />City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.