My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council_Minutes_1980_02_25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
Council_Minutes_1980_02_25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:54:18 AM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:26:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
2/25/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL <br />Page 9 <br />Meyers next brought up a question <br />over the Forder- Trucker project <br />concerning assessments be a portion <br />on t heir properties. He cautioned <br />the City Council on the apportionment, <br />r ut noted that it was legal and proper <br />or apportionment to occur. No other <br />action was taken regarding this matter. <br />He also indicated that the Forder and <br />Trucker Developers felt that they over- <br />built the line and wanted the City to <br />assist them in recapturing of the costs <br />they felt they spent in overbuilding <br />the system. Mr. Meyers noted that the <br />City could do very little to assist <br />them in recapturing some of these costs <br />from other buyers. <br />The Attorney wanted it noted for the <br />official record that the City had <br />received a settlement on the Wallard <br />Walijarvi casein the amount of <br />$23,000.00. He went on to say that <br />there was still one outstanding claim <br />to be settled in the amount of approxi- <br />mately $2,000.00. Finally he noted <br />that the City Treasurer should be aware <br />that the settlement contained a repay- <br />ment clause to the Architect. <br />The Mayor introduced proposed <br />Ordinance 295 creating proposed <br />Chapter 26 obtaining the City's Rules <br />Regulations on Public Improvements <br />and Assessments. City had considerable <br />discussion over Article 26.09. Council <br />requested no amendments be made to the <br />proposal at this time. McCarty moved <br />that Feb. 25th be considered the first <br />reading of the proposed improvement <br />Chapter #26 and that the City dispense <br />with the reading of the proposed Ordi- <br />nance pursuant to the provisions <br />found under the City Charter 3.05 and <br />set the second hearing to be March 10, <br />1980. Ziebarth seconded the motion. <br />4 ayes <br />The motion carried. 0 nays <br />26. FORDER TRUCKER <br />Regular Meeting <br />February 25, 1980 <br />27. PROPOSED CHAPTER 26 <br />FIRST READING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.