Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNDS VIEW CIT`t COUNCIL Regular Meeting <br />PAGE 7 May 27, 1980 <br />instead of specifying June 29th. He would also <br />like to have the city engineer to review the <br />situation and clearly state to Mr. Beyer what the <br />City wants completed. <br />Neil Loeding, 5046 Longview Drive, asked Council <br />for the definition of 3:1 slope. Official Rose <br />stated this was drawn up according to SEH recom- <br />mendations by the city engineer. It is a <br />horizontal to vertical comparison and is done <br />'to prevent yearly maintenance of the area. It <br />will avoid heavy erosion until the grass grows back. <br />Mayor McCarty made a motion to table approval of <br />this contract until Staff can stake the ditch and <br />Mr. Beyer can review it to ascertain that he <br />understands what the City is requesting to be done. <br />Ziebarth seconded the motion. <br />Ayes -5 <br />Nays -0 MOTION CARRIES <br />Item B- Amendment to Northwest Associated Consul- <br />tants Inc. Contract <br />Peg Mountin, 8287 Red Oak Drive, asked Council <br />to discuss this item before making a decision. <br />After a brief discussion, Council removed the <br />item for further discussion. The Planning Com- <br />mission will discuss this on June 4th (with as <br />many Council members present as can attend). <br />This item will again be discussed at the June 9, <br />1980, City Council meeting. <br />Item C- Interim Compensation Resolution #1109. <br />Ziebarth made a motion to approve Item C of the <br />consent agenda (interim compensation resolution <br />#1109) and Hodges seconded it. <br />Ayes -5 <br />Nays -0 <br />MOTION CARRIES (MOTION CARRIES) <br />Official Rose reported that he had received a <br />request from Larry Decheine, Public Works <br />Superintendent, regarding the sandblasting of <br />Tower #1. As work has progressed, the contractors <br />have noted the paint is not adhering properly and <br />the surface is bubbling and peeling off. This <br />is resulting in an uneven exterior surface of new <br />paint. The contractor is suggesting that the entire <br />paint surface be removed down to the original prime <br />coat by a brush -off sandblasting technique. He is <br />also requesting an additional charge for this pro- <br />cedure. <br />Council directed Official Rose to get the speci- <br />fications and charges for the additional work from <br />(MOTION CARRIES) <br />11. REVIEW OF PROJECT 1978 -9 PROGRESS <br />AND SPECIFICATIONS (Cleaning of <br />Tower #1) <br />