Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting <br />Page Three July 14, 1980 <br />would be an additional $900 cost for the project. <br />He would be sending the Council a letter the next <br />day explaining the situation and the need for the <br />additional cost. <br />McCarty made a motion, seconded by Rowley to table <br />Item #B until the receipt of the request for change <br />order on the original contract was received from <br />Dan Boxrud. <br />ITEM #B CONSENT AGENDA <br />MOTION FAILS DUE TO THE AMENDMENT. (MOTION FAILS) <br />Rowley made an amendment to the main motion, <br />seconded by McCarty to approve the $2,200 for the <br />topographical survey from the SDM fund. <br />Ayes -5 <br />Nays -0 <br />ITEM #,B CONSENT AGENDA <br />THE MOTION WAS CARRIED. (MOTION CARRIES) <br />Mayor McCarty informed the Council that Mayor <br />Blomquist has requested support from the suburbs <br />regarding developing a constitutionally valid <br />ordinance that cities can adopt for the control <br />of drug paraphernalia sales. (Memo from Association <br />of Metropolitan Municipalities dated 7- 9 -80). <br />The Council had some discussion about the potential <br />cost of pursuing this ordinance and the <br />level of organization necessary for obtaining <br />this type of commitment from the suburbs. <br />City Attorney Meyers noted that Moundsview currently <br />has a drug paraphernalia ordinance that has been <br />enforced. <br />Acting Clerk- Administrator will bring this item back <br />to the City Council after staff has sent a letter to <br />diem indicating moral support for this ordinance (and <br />also a copy of Moundsview's current drug paraphernalia <br />ordinance) but not indicating any financial commitment <br />at this time. <br />Acting Official Kampel reviewed the Planning Commis- 9. B E ENTERPRISES DUPLEX <br />sions decision on this proposal (7- 2 -80). At that DEVELOPMENT <br />time, they had approved the proposal pending compliance <br />with Resolution #983 as well as a definitive statement <br />of separate water and sewer service and a bond set with <br />the City for $1,000 /unit. They sent this recommendation <br />to Council. <br />Ziebarth made a motion, seconded by Hodges, to approve <br />the B E Enterprise duplex development with the following <br />conditions: 1) a definitive statement of separate water <br />and sewer service to the units, 2) a drainage plan to be <br />in compliance with Resolution #983 which the engineer <br />recommends to be 0.07 acre ft. of pond capacity, 3) an <br />8. LETTER FROM EAGAN MAYOR RE: <br />SALE OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA <br />