My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council_Minutes_1980_07_28
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
Council Minutes 1980
>
Council_Minutes_1980_07_28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2011 2:16:40 PM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:26:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting <br />Page Five July 28, 1980 <br />He also noted the time involved in recruiting and <br />training new personnel. He stated he felt a better <br />pension plan would help alleviate some of the <br />current attrition. Even though a dollar figure could <br />not put the experience in its total perspective, it could <br />provide incentive for the fire fighters to remain on <br />the force. <br />Mayor McCarty noted the value of the current Fire <br />Department and agreed that a dollar value could not <br />be placed upon such service. However, he also stated <br />that current budgetary restrictions made it impossible <br />to increase City financial support for the pension plan. <br />McCarty made a motion, seconded by Ziebarth that the <br />Council concurs with the Fire Department's proposal <br />for the pension plan increase up to but not exceeding <br />the amount that can be supported by the present pension <br />plan itself thereby not requiring additional tax levies <br />for City contribution to this plan. <br />Aye Ziebarth, Forslund, McCarty <br />Nay Rowley (She feels the fire fighters deserve more money <br />for their pension plan even if it means some contribution <br />from the City). <br />THE MOTION WAS CARRIED. (MOTION CARRIES) <br />Councilmember Ziebarth made a motion, seconded by <br />Forslund to approve the Fireman's ReTief Association <br />By Laws as presented. <br />Ayes -4 <br />Nays -0 THE MOTION WAS CARRIED. (MOTION CARRIES) <br />The Council recessed at 9:20 P.M. and resumed at 9:45 P.M. <br />Bruce K. Anderson reviewed the contents of the <br />handouts presented to Council this evening. He <br />basically noted the proposed improvements listed for <br />the park system and the fact that the budget had been <br />reduced without sacrificing the major elements of the <br />scheme. They were suggesting including this referendum <br />at the September election to avoid competition with the <br />general election as well as being more cost effective. <br />The Park and Recreation Board, according to Mr. Anderson, <br />were going to make an active campaign to provide infor- <br />mation to all citizens to help them make an intelligent <br />decision on the referendum. <br />12. PARK BOND REFERENDUM <br />There was some discussion on the pros and cons of presenting <br />this referendum at the primary or general election: <br />Ziebarth made a motion, seconded by Rowley to table the motion. <br />Ayes -4 <br />Nays -0 THE MOTION FAILED. (MOTION FAILS) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.