Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 24, 1982 <br />Regular. Meeting Page Four <br />Mr. Doelz expressed displeasure with the Council <br />and stated they would build on property they own <br />in Lino Lakes if Mounds View wouldn't grant them <br />a variance. <br />Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened <br />the regular meeting at 8:11 PM. <br />Motion /Second: Doty /Blanchard to deny the variance <br />request for Arthur L. Doelz, subject to existing <br />codes. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Olive Miller, 2102 Terrace Drive, stated she was <br />not in favor of a variance being granted, as she <br />would prefer to see unity in the block. <br />Jean Johnson, 2097 Terrace Drive, stated she was <br />the next door neighbor and she had not personally <br />been asked if she would mind an addition to the front <br />of the Doelz's. <br />Motion /Second: McCarty /Hodges to refund one -half <br />of the fees paid for the hearings to the Doelz's. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Mayor McCarty asked that Item C be removed for <br />discussion. <br />Motion /Second: Doty /Forslund to approve the <br />consent agenda, minus Item C, and waive the <br />reading of the resolutions. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion /Second: McCarty Forslund to table any <br />action on the job description of the Public <br />Works Foreman at this time. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion /Second: McCarty /Blanchard to approve the <br />job description of the Building Inspector, noting <br />that the Building Inspector position will pay a <br />minimum of $19,925.00 in the fiscal year 1982. <br />Further, that the position of Building Zoning <br />Official be terminated and Steven Rose re appointed <br />as Building Inspector subject to the approved job <br />description for that position. In recognition of <br />certain transitional tasks necessary to ensure an <br />efficient transfer of duties formerly performed by <br />the Building Zoning Official, the Building <br />Inspector's salary and the resulting reduction will <br />not be fully implemented at this time. It is <br />Motion Carried <br />Motion Carried <br />6. Approval of <br />Consent Agenda <br />Motion Carried <br />:lotion Carried <br />