My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council_Minutes_1982_10_11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
Council_Minutes_1982_10_11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:54:43 AM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:27:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/11/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 <br />Regular Meeting Page Two <br />'Motion/Second: Forslund /Doty to deny Resolution <br />No. 1502. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened <br />the public hearing at 7:40 PM. <br />James Celt, 7751 Greenwood Drive, stated he owns a <br />lot south of County Road I, whi he has been trying <br />to develop for the past five years, and he feels the <br />proposed ordinance will make the land undevelopable. <br />He stated he has had many meetings in the past, and <br />an engineering study has shown it to be buildable, <br />and in meetings with representatives from FEMA, <br />the flood plain organization, they have stated it <br />was buildable. He added, however, if the ordinance <br />is approved, he cannot build on the property. Mr. <br />Celt asked wh.lt the implications of the ordinance <br />would be for him, and asked whether the City would <br />purchase his land in the flood plain. He also <br />pointed out that his lot has value, and it falls within <br />100' of the flood plain, and asked if he would be <br />allowed to build. <br />City Attorney Meyers replied that the ordinance <br />will authorize the acquisition of property, if <br />needed to preserve wetlands, but the City would not <br />be purchasing the property by adopting the ordinance. He stated <br />Mr. Celt would have to apply to have his lot considered for <br />development after the ordinance becomes effective and should make <br />application for a building permit. He also advised Mr. Celt <br />to point. out to the Council how the ordinance impacts his <br />property. <br />Mr. Celt stated he is not interested in building on <br />the lot but would like to sell it. <br />Paul Videen, of Midland- Videen, Inc. 2887 No. Wheeler, <br />Roseville, presented a letter to the Council, and <br />read the letter, stating he is in favor of the <br />ordinance but has two problem areas, those being <br />48.05 Subd. 2, and Subd. 5 -C. Mr. Videen explained <br />he has people who have the ability and are interested <br />in building a commercial building on his property. <br />Perry Langer, 1743 Florence St., White Bear Lake, and <br />'3i11 Langer, 1005 South Circle, Fridley, stated they <br />agreed with Mr. Videen's statements, and asked when <br />the ordinance would take effect. <br />Mayor McCarty replied the ordinance, if adopted this <br />Motion Carried <br />4. Public Hearing: <br />Ordinance No. 318; <br />Creating Muni- <br />cipal <br />Code Chap- <br />ter 48, "Wetland <br />Zoning Ordinance" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.