Council_Minutes_1983_05_09 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council May 9, 1983 Regular Meeting Page Four Motion /Second: Doty /Linke to proceed with the work, ;classed as repair" under 48.07(B), and direct Staff to obtain the necessary construction easements, and prepare plans and specs for obtaining bids, and to obtain a legal land survey as to the exact location of the existing 15 foot easement, with the amount not to exceed $8,300.00, with the :AWM fund to be the source of funds. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk /Administrator Pauley advised the Council that they would probably have to go to bids, due to the cost of the project. Motion /Second: McCarty /Blanchard to rescind the previous motion. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion /Second: Doty /Linke to proceed with the work, classed as "repair" under 48.07(b), and direct Staff to obtain the necessary construction easements, and prepare plans and specs for obtaining bids, and to obtain a legal land survey as to the exact location of the existing 15 foot easement, with legal fees and survey costs t• come from the SWM fund. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk /Administrator Pauley reported that at the last Council meeting, they had several issues before then relative to this property, and that a public hearing was held, with several items considered, and basically three actions required, an ordinance rezoning the property from R -1 to R -3, a resolution approving the subdivision of the property and a conditional use permit, and the execution of a development agreement. At that time, the resolution was tabled and referred back to Staff, with the Council rezoning the property from R -1 to R 2, desiring duplexes rather than multi- ple family. The first reading of the ordinance was held, but the second reading will not be presented to the Council until an acceptable subdivision and development agreement has been worked out. Director Johnson reported that Mr. Dalberg had originally applied for R -2 zoning, for the division of the northerly most lot in half, then the three lots to R -2. The Planning Commission at their agenda session advised that they could not agree with the widths and based on that, Mr. Dalberg came back with his new proposal. He stated Mr. Dalberg has asked for consideration of the utilization of the land for better use of the property, and as a transition Motion Carried Motion Carried Motion Carried 8. Consideration of Staff Memo and Letter from Mr. Dalberg Requesting Continuance of Rezoning Request