Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 9, 1993 <br />Regular Meeting Page Five <br />between the different zonings in the area. Director <br />Johnson outlined Mr. Dalberg's new proposal. <br />Mr. Dalberg stated he can meet all the requirements <br />of the City for square footage, and that the buildings <br />would be 100 feet from the rear of the lot line, putting <br />200 feet between buildings. He pointed out his proposal <br />would be a better tax value for the City with six units, <br />but the City would not agree to waive the frontage <br />requirements. <br />Mayor McCarty pointed out that in order to comply with <br />requirements for R -2 zoning on the three existing lots <br />on Silver Lake Road, which were two at 75' a:1d one at <br />85', Mr. Dalberg did not have the required frontage <br />and would have to go with R -1. He recommended Mr. <br />Dalberg go back to the Planning Commission and go over <br />his proposal with them and review the Comp Plan. Mr. <br />Dalberg objected to paying additional fees and returning <br />to the Planning Commission as he felt he had done all he <br />could at the Planning Commission level. Mayor McCarty <br />stated the fee could be waived and Mr. Dalberg could go <br />back under his last application. <br />Mr. Dalberg stated he was concerned with the time <br />factor and did not want to go back to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Councilmember Hankner reported she had spoken with <br />several Planning Commissioners, and their reasoning <br />for their decision was to have a transition for <br />zoning. She stated she would feel more comfortable <br />with Mr. Dalberg going back to the Planning Commission. <br />She also asked if another public hearing would be required. <br />Director Johnson stated he could not guarantee the <br />Planning Commission could discuss the proposal at <br />their next agenda session, since the cut -off date <br />was May 1, but it would be up to the discretion <br />of the Chair of the Commission. <br />Attorney Meyers stated that a first public hearing <br />had been held, and if they were not having a second <br />reading, he would recommend another notice be sent <br />out, and they could continue the second reading <br />and notify all the people involved. <br />Motion /Second: McCarty /Hankner to postpone <br />the next regular Council meeting, Ordinance <br />and notify the affected property owners and <br />the public hearing notice, with the hearing <br />at 8:10 PM on May 23. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />until <br />No. 339, <br />republish <br />to be <br />Director Johnson stated he would inform the Planning <br />Commission, by memo, of the Council's position. <br />Motion Carried <br />