Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 23, 1984 <br />Regular Meeting Page Four <br />subdivision. He presented the Council with a copy <br />of their new proposed plan. <br />Councilmember Hankner expressed concern regard- <br />ing the time element, as the nuisance problem still <br />exists, and deadlines had been set before. <br />Mr. Sjodin stated that if the concept is approved, <br />it can be drawn up properly and back to the City <br />within one week. <br />Mayor McCarty stated that while he was concerned <br />with the time element also, he felt the Council <br />should stay within their realm of responsibility, <br />and the plan should go back to the Planning <br />Commission for their review. <br />Motion /Second: McCarty /Doty to table any further <br />action on the Fairchild Avenue vacation until the <br />first regular Council meeting in March. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Councilmember Linke reminded the Council that they <br />had promised the residents that action would be <br />taken this evening, and he pointed out how very <br />last minute the sketch was that was just presented. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated she did not feel the <br />Council has established that the improvements are <br />going to go in, and she expressed concern about <br />the time element, as Mrs. Gale and Ms. Yost have <br />had a year and a half to get a plan together, <br />and the neighbors are concerned with the time lag. <br />Mr. Bremmer asked the Council what was to prevent <br />the issue from going on and on. He reminded them <br />they have been working toward a resolution for 18 <br />months, and that last October they were told a <br />decision would be reached by the Council in <br />January, and now the Council has extended that <br />deadline another two months, to March. <br />Mayor McCarty explained they could order the <br />vacation tonight or table further action until <br />March to give the applicants ample opportunity <br />to follow through, and that if they have not <br />proceeded by March, the Council can go forward <br />at that time with the vacation. <br />Mr. Bremmer stated he would like some definite <br />pre established parameters set up, as the deadline <br />keeps being moved out. Mayor McCarty replied <br />that if nothing happens in March, the Council <br />will definitely remove the item from the table <br />and take some action. <br />Motion Carried <br />