My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council_Minutes_1984_02_13
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
Council Minutes 1984
>
Council_Minutes_1984_02_13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2011 3:05:55 PM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:27:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 13, 1984 <br />Regular Meeting Page Seven <br />relieving him of the duty of making Police Civil <br />Service Commission appointment recommendations. <br />Councilmember Blanchard questioned that, since <br />the original motion had failed, whether Mayor <br />McCarty was ready to make another motion. Mayor <br />McCarty replied that he was not, at this time. <br />Motion /Second: Hankner Linke to call for the <br />question. <br />3 ayes 2 nays <br />Mayor McCarty and Councilmember Doty voted against <br />the motion, which then failed, lacking a 2/3 vote. <br />Mayor McCarty stated the Council had stated they <br />would prefer to have him making the commission <br />appointment recommendations. <br />Councilmember Hankner pointed out no formal motion <br />was made to that effect, and she does not see any <br />need to make a specific motion relieving the Mayor <br />of any duty, as the State law explains itself. <br />Councilmember Doty stated he had voted against <br />the motion, not because of the person but because <br />of the policy change. <br />Mayor McCarty stated it has always been the policy <br />of the Council to reappoint commission members who <br />have not been shown to have committed misfeasence <br />in office, and that as part of the process this <br />year, those incumbent commissioners who wished to <br />continue service to the City were automatically <br />reappointed, and that it was understood that if <br />an incumbent was not to be reappointed, that <br />person would receive specific reasons in writing <br />from the Council, which could be completely -fired <br />at a public hearing. He added that in this parti- <br />cular case, he feels the commissioner was not <br />given the opportunity and courtesies he should <br />have received, nor was there a proven case of <br />malfeasence, and removal was arbitrary. <br />Councilmember Blanchard had no report. <br />Gouncilmember Doty reported the ditch repair work <br />on County Road H2 and Long Lake Road appears to <br />be going along well. <br />Councilmember Doty reported he would not be able <br />to attend the City Dinner planning meeting on <br />February 15, as he will be out of town. <br />Councilmember Linke reported he would not be able <br />Motion Failed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.