My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council_Minutes_1984_02_27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
Council_Minutes_1984_02_27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:54:53 AM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:27:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
2/27/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 27, 1984 <br />Regular Meeting Page Two <br />There were no residents requests or comments from <br />the floor. <br />Motion /Second: Linke /Doty to approve the consent <br />agenda as presented, and waive the reading of the <br />resolutions. <br />3 ayes <br />Councilmember Doty reported the Park and Rec <br />Commission will be meeting March 1 at 6:30 PM. <br />Councilmember Doty inquired as to the status of <br />the Long Lake Road ditch project. Clerk/ <br />Administrator Pauley replied there is very little <br />left to be done, and they must see if the seed <br />takes hold. <br />Councilmember Linke had no report. <br />Mayor McCarty asked the status of the inquiry <br />into the racetrack /airport issue. <br />7. Residents Re- <br />quests and <br />Comments from <br />the Floor <br />8. Approval of <br />Consent Agenda <br />0 nays Motion Carried <br />Attorney Rushton reported City Attorney Meyers 9. Report of <br />would be back in town for the next Council meeting. Attorney <br />She also reported she had received a letter from <br />Paul Ratelle, the attorney for Greg Johnson, <br />responding to the City's correspondence, and <br />rejecting the suggestions of the City, and <br />requesting continuation of the business out of <br />his home until April 1, 1986. She added that <br />Mr. Johnson also feels he is currently in com- <br />pliance with the code with his home occupation, <br />but if the Council will advise him of areas of <br />non compliance, he will attempt to address them. <br />Attorney Rushton reported that Mr. Ratelle is <br />asking for a two week response to his letter <br />dated February 17, and has advised that if he <br />has not heard from the City within that time <br />frame, his client may file a counterclaim. <br />It was the feeling of the Council that another <br />two years was too long for, the business to <br />stay in operation. They also agreed that Mr. <br />Johnson is not in compliance with the home <br />occupation ordinance. It was decided to <br />discuss the matter further at the next agenda <br />session. The Council directed Attorney Rushton <br />to advise Mr. Ratelle that the Council needs <br />more time to respond. <br />10. Reports of <br />Councilmembers <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.