My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council_Minutes_1986_06_23
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
Council Minutes 1986
>
Council_Minutes_1986_06_23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2011 4:05:29 PM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:28:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 23, 1986 <br />Regular Meeting Page Four <br />l.erk /Administrator Pauley explained that all the <br />iuineering studies that have previously been done <br />are available at City Hall for review. <br />Mayor Linke directed Director Thatcher to look into <br />removing the sleeves. <br />Clerk /Administrator Pauley reviewed the basic require- <br />ments to be eligible for flood insurance. <br />Motion /Second: Quick /Hankner to approve the consent <br />agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of the <br />resolutions. <br />5 ayes <br />0 nays Motion Carried <br />Director Thatcher reviewed the proposal of Mary <br />Anderson Homes to construct six unit townhouses in <br />lieu of the previously planned eight unit condo <br />minium structures. He stated the Planning Commission <br />has reviewed this and recommends approval contingent <br />upon approval from the majority of the home owners <br />association. <br />arlin Grant, of Mary Anderson Homes, stated they had <br />net with the condominium residents last Tuesday, and <br />16 out of 17 who were present signed the agreement to <br />change the remaining condominium land to townhouses. <br />He stated there were no negative comments what so <br />ever, and the one person who did not sign the agreement <br />chose not to because he did not sign things of this <br />nature in general. <br />Judith Maekel stated it was her husband who did not <br />sign, and while she had not been at the meeting herself, <br />she was concerned with what the ramifications could be. <br />She added she has nothing against what they are planning <br />to do, but she is confused. <br />Councilmember Haake explained that the developer can <br />only construct condominium units or townhouses there, <br />and nothing else. <br />Attorney Meyers advised Mrs. Maekel to have her attorney <br />review the association bylaws if she had any questions, <br />as it is not the City's responsibility or authority to <br />do so. <br />Mrs. Maekel stated she was concerned that there were <br />of as many street lights in place as she felt there <br />hould be. <br />6. Approval of <br />Consent Agenda <br />7. Consideration of <br />Resolution No. <br />2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.