Laserfiche WebLink
irector Thatcher replied that the developer has agreed <br />many of the items that are now listed in the proposed <br />agreement, but a development agreement was never done <br />or this development. <br />.irector Thatcher stated he does not want a detention <br />pond in the area, as was originally planned, and this <br />proposal does meet Code for storm water detention. <br />Mounds View City Counci). <br />August 25, 1986 <br />Councilmember Hankner asked if that would fall into the <br />overall John Johnson plan. Director Thatcher replied it <br />would, but it has not yet been determined how to pay <br />for it. <br />Councilmember Haake stated she was concerned with putting <br />this cost onto the other residents for this development, <br />to handle the storm water. <br />Clerk /Administrator Pauley stated they cannot stop the <br />property owner from developing. <br />Mayor Linke asked if the City was under the gun to push <br />this through. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated that since the Council has <br />nct seen the development agreement until now, and <br />-here is much new information to review, she would like <br />D continue the discussion over to the next agenda session. <br />Motion /Second: Linke /Hankner to place a prohabition of <br />any further building permits to be put forth on this <br />development until the plat is approved and a development <br />agreement entered into. <br />5 ayes <br />It was the concensus of the Council to discuss this <br />further at the next agenda session. <br />Motion /Second: Hankner /Quick to approve Resolution <br />No. 2065, adopting the Economic Development Plan, and <br />waive the reading. <br />5 ayes <br />Regular Meeting <br />Page Five <br />0 nays Motion Carried <br />10. Consideration <br />of Resolution <br />No. 2065 <br />0 nays Motion Carried <br />Clerk /Administrator Pauley reviewed the proposed 11. Consideration <br />policy for park land use adjacent to residential of Resolution <br />property. No. 2067 <br />