Council_Minutes_1988_11_14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Commission would recommend issuance of the wetland alteration permit. The two issues they addressed for variances were the 100' setback for the roadway, which they felt was justified for safety in connecting with Cou Road J, and the variance for being within the 10 0' buffer zone, due to the location of the Williams pipeline on the property. That issue, however, no exists, as the developer is proposing to move the building closer to the pipeline, which will take them completely out of the buffer. Peter Seipp, president of SYSCO /Minnesota, briefly reviewed their intended use of the building, and he introduced the other members of the development team that were present with him. Scott Kinkaid, of Ryan Construction, reviewed the pro- posal, showing their location in the City, access to the property parking, the location of the building on the lot, and the planned construction materials. He explained a number of revisions have been made to the site plans due to wetland concerns, and he reviewed the changes made. He also explained they have been able to move the building out of the 100' buffer zone. Peter Sabee, of Barr Engineering, explained they had reviewed the proposed development at the request of the City, and in the course of that evaluation looked at the development with respect to specific criteria as specified in the ordinance, the Corps of Engineers wetland delineation and Mounds View's wetland delinea- tion. Mr. Sabee reviewed the conditions which must be met for a wetlands alteration permit to be granted. Mr. Sabee reviewed his written report and their findings on the permit standards in the wetland ordinance, specifically concerning filling, dredging, discharges, storm water run -off, building constraints and removal of vegetation. He stated that in summary, all the criteria listed is in compliance with respect to the development application and City Ordinance, and he recommended the Council consider having the work areas delineated so there is an understanding of which areas will be impacted. Mr. Sabee explained the proposed development does not fall within the 100 year flood boundary, so Chapter 49 does not apply, and he reviewed the requirements of Chapter 49a. Mr. Sabee stated in summary that a review of the docu- ments submitted for the proposed development indicate compliance with all requirements of Chapters 48, 49 and 49A of the Mounds View Municipal Code, with one exception, that the roadway access to the development November 14 Page Two