My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1997/02/24
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
Minutes - 1997/02/24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:26:10 PM
Creation date
2/8/2011 11:17:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
2/24/1997
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 7 <br />February 24, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />AP~i~~'~CD <br />Public Hearing and Introduction for First Readin= of Ordinance No. 595, An Ordinance adding day <br />care centers and group nurseries as a Conditbnal Use in the B-1, B-2, B~, B-4 and I-1 zoning districts. <br />Mayor McCarty opened the Public Hearing at 8:20 p.m. <br />Ms. Sheldon explained that Ordinance was prompted in part by a request by the Children's Home Society to go <br />into the Bel Rae if it is converted to a Community Center. The property where the Bel Rae is located is <br />currently zoned B-3, which does not allow Day Care Centers as a permitted use. Additionally, it was felt that <br />this change would also allow for the possibility of on-site daycare for some of the employers in the community. <br />Julie Olson, 2663 Lake Court Circle, felt this may allow for a Kinder Care to locate in an industrial park. <br />She feels perhaps the Ordinance may be too broad. <br />Ms. Sheldon noted a that conditional uses would require special review by the Planning Commission and the <br />City Council therefore the suitability of the site could be addressed in that process. <br />A discussion followed in regard to concerns about the possibility of a child care facility locating within a close <br />proximity of adult establishments or liquor stores. Ms. Trude stated she would like to see some distance <br />requirements established to prevent potential problems such as this. There was also discussion as to the <br />• possibility of re-zoning the Bel Rae property, however Ms. Sheldon noted that this could place other <br />restrictions on the property. Council member Stigney noted that he would like to obtain information in regard <br />to the safety level for a child's exposure to exhaust fumes. <br />Mayor McCarty closed the Public Hearing at 8:33 p.m. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Trude to Table the Introduction of Ordinance No. 595, to allow stafftime to <br />obtain additional information. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />COUNCIL BUSIlVESS• <br />A. Statue Report on Pedestrian Bridge over Highway 10. <br />Ms. Sheldon provided a summary as to the status of the proposed pedestrian bridge project. She noted that at <br />the last City Council meeting, several issues were raised and the council wished to continue the discussion at <br />the February 24th meeting. Ms. Sheldon proceeded to address each of the issues -the extent of public notice <br />and participation, the projected costs and sources of firnding for the bridge, and the impact or usefiilness of the <br />bridge. She also went through the estimated budget for the project, detailing three different financing <br />scenarios for the local costs. She noted that there is sufficient funds available in Tax Increment Financing <br />funds to pay part or all of the local costs. Additionally, MSA funds could be used, however timing for future <br />road projects would need to be adjusted. <br />Mayor McCarty thanked Ms. Sheldon for all the work she has done on this project and the long hours she has <br />worked. However, he still has concerns that he feels need to be addressed. If the city intends to keep faith with <br />. the spirit and intent of Chapter 8 of the City Charter, it would not go forth with projects which get out of hand <br />in cost ovemms. In regard to his concerns about the sources of funding, in particular the street lighting funds, <br />he stated he feels taxpayers expected the funds to be used for streetlights in their own neighborhoods, not for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.