Laserfiche WebLink
Page 8 <br />February 24, 1997 <br />Mounds View City Council <br /> <br />the bridge project. He stated there has been no evidence by expert testimony or scientific study and <br />demographics, traffic analysis or a needs asses~nent to support any claim that a pedestrian bridge on Long <br />Lake Road will offer a broad benefit to the majority of Mounds View citizens. <br />Furthermore he sees a safety issue with regard to the design of the ramp and where the spiral ramp empties, the <br />compatibility of skateboards/bicycles/rollerblading and foot traffic on the bridge deck. Longterm maintenance <br />estimates are limited to best guesses, and no provisions have been made for future replacement costs. The cost <br />of the project has escalated from the original $120,000 estimate to approximately $246,500, representing a <br />105% cost ovemin. He feels all of this makes this project unfeasible for the city at this time. <br />MOTION/SECOND: McCarty/Koopmeiners that the City Council stop all fimrther action on the pedestrian <br />bridge over Highway 10, settle aU accounts owed to date, abandon the bridge project and notify appropriate <br />government agencies of this action. <br />Jerry Linke, 2319 Knoll Drive, stated as Mayor he found the financing options while working with the city <br />auditors and temporary finance department head. At that time, he had been informed that tax increment <br />financing was not a financing option, as would have been his first choice. He noted that the city does have <br />letters of support from both the Police Chief and the Minnesota State Patrol. Without doubt, and in his <br />opinion, the $200,000 is worth saving a life and he still feels he made the right choice in voting approval of the <br />pedestrian bridge. <br />Jill (last name inaudible), a resident of Mounds View and a employee at Pinewood Elementary School, stated <br />on a daily basis she witnesses cars that blatantly disregard children on the streets and walkways. She feels it is <br />unsafe to cross Highway 10. Furthermore, she feels it is very disrespectfui to citizens who served on the Task <br />Force to now vote down the project. She, as a taxpayer, is willing to pay for the bridge to allow citizens access <br />to the other side. <br />Russ Nordstrom, 2536 W. County Road H2, stated he is opposed to the project and feels kids need to use <br />common sense. There are plenty of opportunities to cross the highway with the stoplight walk signs. He feels <br />kids are not going to take the time to walk the extra distance just to use the bridge, and he feels this would just <br />be a waste of taxpayer funds. <br />Karen Arciero, 7501 Spring Lake Road, stated she feels the bridge is needed. She stated as an adult she is <br />often scared to cross Highway 10. She feels the city needs to provide a safe opportunity for kids to cross the <br />highway. <br />Henry Ruggles, 2629 Lake Court Drive, stated he has been opposed to the bridge since the beginning. He too <br />feels that skateboarders will be using the bridge and cause seniors to be afraid to do so. Additionally, he is <br />concerned about how the costs have increased. He does not feel that the cost will justify the amount it will be <br />used. <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, stated he agrees it would be nice to have a safe option for kids to cross <br />the highway, but the city needs to consider what it can really afford. <br />Sherry Gunn, 8120 Red Oak Court, stated Mounds View represents pride, partnership and progress. She feels <br />the bridge is a sign of progress for the city, and the community residents working with the council and stag' <br />represents parnership. The bridge was a topic of the Focus 2000 group as a means of connecting the <br />community and she asked that the council let the work continue. <br />