My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� ___'__'-' 1_. _ � . ;:., �. . _ ._� r'_ ' " ' . ._. .. _ .��� <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />l�egular Meeting <br />_ k..,��9..,.�____.��_, C�'- -- --_�� � ---_- ---= <br />February 4, 1998 <br />Page 8 <br />Mre Cunningham told the owners of the adjoining properties that TOLD would be <br />willing to re-engineer the site so that all storm water run-off was stored on Walgreen <br />property, including that of the adjoining properties. ,;;y:;�y <br />;��:. <br />�, <br />Joan �olleen, 2617 County Road I, said her concerns;,were ligh;�z��;, ;���c, and the <br />,r <br />easements that are involved. She asked who would }���ponsib�� ic�;: ir�� ta�ces that <br />would be paid on the 45 feet of property that the :x�jec�t report �f fc ;;lr�ak���'s�� �7iven to <br />��, <br />adjoining neighbors. Would this be considered a S�'�nic easet�k`ei�t o� �7 ��� t� ��;�a ;�;� ease.z�i <br />she asked. '��� '% � _ ': .:.� <br />Associate Ericson stated the property would be o <br />developer would be paying taxes on that properly;; <br />Ms. Keyes said she is not interested in the <br />Ms. Colleen said she is concerned tha%��vvhat� <br />development, will in fact, happen as'y`itis agre< <br />A,ssociate Ericson assured <br />a developers agreement, th� <br />through with the terms o�t <br />that the project will b� �;c�xxt7 <br />�:�`���.��',.'41;'s�fbNl� il'�f*i21���i'ils'1# 7.()�b <br />these ���C.�'��; c�A` l�izc! vJ����B��� <br />7. Sta,€�'�"ep� <br />Director Jopke <br />area No. l, will <br />ca«se sh� <br />ed, i <br />developer and the <br />to maintain it. <br />to the proposed <br />>> <br />:� --- <br />, � <br />1V.�_ Colleen �at once tk�� resolution is established, and there is <br />�;agreemenx�?vill be the;;E�w. If the developer does not follow <br />�� agreerr��r��: ther� �>3be a performance bond to make sure <br />pleted as x=�t F:;��r �' <br />, <br />��:11e audience the Comprehensive Plan review that includes <br />�� 6?c�dressed on February 11, 1998. He invited all interested <br />:> <br />_:. <br />l� <br />Commission the first meeting of the Comprehensive Plan Update, <br />cafeteria of the Pinewood School on February 1 l, 1998. <br />�:'hairperson;.>�rid Planning Commissioners Reports <br />r��ioner Miller told the Commissioners she would be absent from the Planning <br />ssion meeting to be held on the 1 Sth of February due to medical reasons. <br />9. Adjournment <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.