Laserfiche WebLink
_ ._ , _ - _ _ <br />_ _` _ _ _ __ _ <br />� ` _��_ . �.- �- <br />_ ___ _ _ _ . <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular 1Vleeting <br />Februaiy 4, 1998 <br />Page 5 <br />This is the reason that the Comprehensive Plan would have to be amended for the <br />Walgreen Deve(opment. <br />The Comprehensive Plan issues are: <br />What kind of buffer is the developer prc <br />Traf�c impact, a 40 percent increase in <br />Suitability for residential development. <br />The impac on the City's tax base. <br />Green space <br />The rezoning issues are: <br />The relationship to the Comprehensiv <br />Surrounding developments, what au'e.- <br />Demonstrated need for the deveiopmf <br />Grading issues <;,r� <br />Traffic impact, closing oi�;Eastwood;<-i <br />:.: .<,,� <br />Crime impact >'>'''"� `� <br />�:.>Y <br />_,�i` <:i>,':!if .3:' . <br />Commissioner John <br />the statement made h <br />WaL��t;n nroiect r{r�� <br />�sf there was any verification to back up <br />:>�� <br />� would fall in value by 15 percent if the <br />am declined to comment. <br />stated that she had a realtor appraise her property. <br />�erty would decrease in value by 10 - 15 percent if <br />'/�.�� �reenwood Drive, asked the Commission who would be <br />�c'��ase in value of his property if the Wa(green project is approved. <br />ission to research this question and have some type of answer <br />meeting that involved the project. <br />�r Obert su��ested that the City use an independent real estate appraiser to <br />perties in question. <br />rlsgociate Ericson stated that an independent appraiser was available for the City's use <br />and the City Attorney could be called in to answer questions of valuation impact that the <br />Walgreen project might have. <br />