Laserfiche WebLink
_ _ _ <br />` _ <br />` ---__: _�. �------- -- _--��. r ,. _ : <br />F <br />_' _.,_ k ` . . � <br />.��: _ .__� _ "'' _"' '_..__' . !. . . - <br />- - , _ 3i t <br />� - <br />Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1998 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />Chair Peterson asked for a vote on the motion on the floor. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 2(Brasaemle, Obert) ;%�� <br />��� <br />The motion carried. ' <br />;, <br />� �. <br />,�, '' ` p � <br />Commissioner Brasaemle made his opposition st�lement as follpul�; '�`�2r ��A, ut the„r;;� <br />builder in the unfortunate position of having to d�;t�'e dirty wQ�rk'of a�tit��� ��-t�s � _`H� <br />� rxi� <br />controversial variance on a property that the EDt� lciae�.v w���ubstandaz ci n.+��l f".��,E �4t� <br />builder would have a problem getting the variati�c� graxa���'�� rX he EDA , ii2 c�`��f..~i, �`�orced the <br />Planning Commission to grant a variance on a pPOj�ci ������'�$; v,�o�xld not nornaally approve. <br />Commissioner Obert made his opposition <br />City had to do something right with the Ho <br />around the rules. Obert said he disasrees.vt <br />6. ;; <br />Planning Case No. 507-97 f r <br />2625 Highway 10, 7715-7761 East�rqttt{�R <br />Applicant: TOLD Development ��`riipany <br />Consideratiot� of Resolution I��o 5�6-98 lE�. <br />Rezoning ��,q�est for Wal.;;y, ��'�;Develor��: <br />it ��s ��(Cc��r,�, �.�'he first opportunity the <br />plac�r��x�G�'�'ca,��� they decided to go <br />���r-oach Y�z 5��,`c������ri solving. <br />, ;: <br />_ .7 <br />� <br />;=<,;s <br />� <br />�prehensive Plan Amendment and <br />The ap�al��;t�a��9 '"�'�?L,L� 1�crT��Cs��a���a� Company, was present. <br />Associ:��� �Lu��;�a��1, j����ie;v��ed th'e Planning Commission Memo dated March 18, 1998 <br />which gave bac;l<�;r�>�zr�nl iti%rmation regarding the March 4, 1998 Planning Commission <br />� <br />>meeting where acc;ict�9�4 c�ata for County Road I between Long Lake Road and Highway 10 <br />was discussed �so discussed at this meeting was accident data. for the intersection of <br />Highway 10 anc};County Road I. <br />��_��F�act to;=�va:�tres of adjacent properties was discussed. The American Planning <br />����w€���tt�n's(APA) research division was contacted and information was requested that <br />�v�3azl'r�}ielp shed some light on how the Walgreen's Development would impact the <br />s�_��rounding neighborhood. The information had not been received at the time of the <br />March 18, 1998 meeting. As soon as the information becomes available the Commission <br />and public will be brought up to date on this issue. <br />TOLD Development is still involved in negotiations with the neighboring property owners <br />on how best to resolve the water drainage and property delvaluation issues. <br />