Laserfiche WebLink
'I � _ , r . _ � - ��?_ __ •--'----- . 4 <br />f __,� _ _ �� � ` >:_- = . - =-- - -- - -- - -_ - - - --- - - --- --- -- �r: <br />._.__ ... F - - <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />March 18, 1998 <br />Page 5 <br />New information brought to the Commission and public's attention was presented as <br />follows: Ramsey County will require that the developer improve the intersection of <br />County Road I and Highway 10 by constructing a right-turn lane on westbou��'4�° County <br />�''� <br />Road I onto Highway 10. This construction, it is believed wiil pr�`vent st���ing of vehicles <br />beyond the proposed Walgeen's access on County Road I. �'� <br />NInDOT has sta.ted it will not permit the currently,piCriposed ri <br />,,.: � <br />Highway 10 due to the following: ;3�'�� <br />1. Its close proximity to the intersection oi i <br />2. The property has an alternative means ob` <br />Staff has enlisted the advise of Mounds View P��t <br />assess the possibility of adding some typ� of tr�.�ic <br />This step could possibly reduce or slow c���� z� ��.y�i <br />Associate Ericson told the Commt �ion t�ac, �;��y f` <br />Comprehenstve Plan amendments,require a.=�ubltc <br />City Council but also with th� I�1�xYin�ng �ommissi <br />on Resolution 536-98 until <��e�: �:h� Pub� c Hearin <br />7:00 p.m., at the City Hall ;;�' ; �� <br />access <br />and county �-a���� <br />; properiy via County Road I. <br />c�,�a1�>���c� �ix� r:,����, lVlike Ulrich, to <br />calmin� xr��vs�� �°,. �o Greenwood Drive. <br />�-,,��assin� ��r��a�fi;�a'tk�e neighborhood. <br />4•/ � <br />a�c�t�bE � ►�,��%advised staffthat <br />���71��i��,�.��be held not only with the <br />�� =�'��ieAeiore, no action can be taken <br />���hat is scheduled for April 1, 1998, <br />rson tl�r����`i.h�.£loor ovr.;i t�'�"��.� Development for its presentation. <br />��� �'�ac��2�,���;Ta�r��n�� �����i�,�€����'c�u� ior TOLD Development, addressed the Commission as <br />follo�,v��� Y�1�.E� ���uhc-tra�rd c��z �"c�k���y^,�oad I, as proposed by MnDOT, is acceptable with the <br />develop��-'FaK�t� �h��>..will ati�ry�1 �.��z, �onstruction. <br />�t`�LD is of the t��i��:it�ri �hai the issue of the right-in right-out access is being passed <br />around from person �t� person at MnDOT. At first MnDOT indicated that the right-in <br />right-out access sc.enario would be acceptable. At a later date, with a different person from <br />MnDOT rev�ewing the plan, it was decided the access scenario would not be acceptable. <br />C;urrently the ��.n is in the hands of Michael Christiansen, who has indicated the City of <br />R�o�ands V�eu,►�'�as the right to grant the development access to Highway 10 over the <br />��,�F;� Expr�n�MnDOT sta.ff. If the City disregards MnDOT's recommendations, it is up to <br />��vd6,a$ Wir�T's staffto object to this decision. This is important for two reasons: <br />1. Access to the Walgreen store. <br />2. To keep as much traffic off of County Road I as possible. <br />