My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
"� �,,/L �. r <br />�! F _ M _ �.� : a. - - --- _ . --_ - = 3� - �.._.� `--- _ . � - <br />_ ._�_- �_�_.___��_ e__ - �,�-_-_ --. .- -_. . . .., . '- .,_,. . _�,:_ . - -- (s <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />March 18, 1998 <br />Page 7 <br />Associate Ericson told Ms. Keyes the City has contracted with the American Planning <br />Association who is doing research into what other studies have been done specific to the <br />issue of how developments can affect the surrounding neighborhoods. The,ii�formation is <br />forthcoming. - j� <br />'_�. <br />Ms. Keyes told the Commission she had been in touc�Z;y�ith t��� �x����� ��r.:;r,�neral's Office. <br />They have indicated the City of Mounds View wo�Idyultimately 1�� St�xG�x�;��lly r�spons�ble� <br />for any negative impact that the development wou�t�have on ��e �ic�J��� �����������;=h�,c��ho��� <br />property values. �'� ;�sf' ' '>� � <br />,�.,... � <br />Commissioner Brasaemle told Ms. Keyes that ih� ��is;� ,�}�E.��-r��y would bc �i,�, ��t�l�ropriate <br />person to respond to her statement ,: ; _ <br />Chaii• Peterson opened the floor for disrussi���;:�f �Ir.� Comta�is�i���?`<� ��.ossible leanings on <br />the Walgreen's Development. <br />Commissioner Obert stated the penple he ha� i�l1c.��i tcr, ancl i�edback he has gotten from <br />the community forums, indicates t�e citizeta�;oi th� ���������.tnity want any commercial <br />��_; <br />development that takes pla.c�r �v�i;��iin the �i�y to be res,�rici�d to the Highway 10 corridor. <br />i JF. �/ <br />Commissioner Brasaem <br />to H�ghway 10, and tl�as z <br />� ,<, <br />I��f� .�_r.'��;� �5lcr;c� the (�'�1rt�� <br />dPV��r��,�xt��x� to encr-o�iu�� <br />CO IIl I�TI ll.�� ll�il�i; f�l<.° <�i�1��`.'='f ��! c� E� <br />e <br />tial us� <br />�i�served t��t the W��een's Development isn't strictly limited <br />K��. <br />e dilerrd�� ���'����t3evelopment. <br />� <br /><:� <br />e,ion to wf�<�l �„ient the City was going to allow commercial <br />��.�identially zoned areas. <br />Ms. Arel to keep in mind the fact that commercial <br />City's tax revenues. Commercial taxes subsidize the <br />Chair Peterson s��ed'that access to the commercial areas is the one element that will keep <br />;.:;> <br />the commercial.t�evelopments centralized to the Highway 10 corridor and out of the <br />neighborhood:��sidential areas. It is not convenient to get offof a major road to access <br />�. <br />.c,ommerci�ai business. <br />�v�E�i; ��;�yes made the observation that quite a lot of the commercial development that is <br />�oyxi.� on in the City is TIF funded. She stated that these TIF funded projects don't add <br />anything to the immediate tax base. <br />Commissioner Brasaemle responded by saying the Walgreen Development is not a TIF <br />assisted project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.