My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
--- - - ---- ---- �- - - <br />�J .. . _ _. . . _ <br />1 <br />J <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />. . '--- .---. -- .- I �� ' _.'_ 4 - ' '--_ --s-�I �-r�--7-� .�. <br />March 18, 1998 <br />Page 8 <br />Ms. Arel told the Commission that they would be setting a precedent by rezoning the <br />residential areas to commercial for the Walgreen development. <br />Commissioner Brasaemle told Ms. Arel that the this Planning �' <br />sensitive to the issue of rezoning residential property �nio com�a,� <br />that this Commission is not interested in encouragin��€j%i�ajor e��i <br />property through Mounds View turned into comm�r�ial+proper'cy. <br />frontage on, and adjacent to Highway 10, are the;a,r,eas that are;�e <br />commercial development. ,:"��, ,;;;;;��'� <br />��:, � <br />Commissioner Brasaemle said he is still ui <br />and asked the staff to develop resolutions to <br />project. <br />Commissioner Miller stated she, too, is ��i�S �,n <br />Commissioner Obert stated he �s fia;ving trou�sl <br />, <br />to deny the project. The City doe�;tieed to :tak�e <br />potential in order to keep the,Git�'s serv�c� at a <br />Cih'• .....'-0t�� �.;rr <br />Chair Peterson sta cc c��,;co;a� <br />ihiz�!,��r�ducing mc��� �;���, x� <br />��v<;�t��i�r��nc is v���; €;e�ci� <br />Cor�r�a4�siozi:is to tgy �nc� a3 <br />City's r�;std�z���.' ,�'h� t:w� �; <br />is undeGic$�d b�u�; lt��ni�� �o <br />ed <br />:s�:�m�ss�b�"was very <br />a°�i�t1 p�'aperty. He added <br />�A�� i;t� ���;a wide swath of <br />;� �< ���e��erties that h��� <br />a• f�`�� <br />i�►g c.�a�a:;.�d�r�c�. for .� %;� <br />algreen's Develo�d,�erit issue <br />7�,oval and denial of the <br />ect. <br />� c�e�ision whether to support or <br />o�its commercial development <br />e level for the residents of the <br />ercial �a�o��r���e worth more than residential properties, <br />nue. ��r�,cC�y �rain a financial point of view the Walgreen's <br />� tla� Ciicy c�i'IViounds View. The role of the Planning <br />r� out which course is best for the City's businesses and the <br />��� h��!e to be balanced against each other. He added, he, too, <br />rzU <����roval of the project.. <br />�s: Keyes and �kz� �`csmra�ission had an extensive discussion in regards to how the <br />'(�Valgreen's Dev�to�r�erai might effect the adjacent properties' ability to handle water <br />runoff. . '� <br />�ommissione;r:�tevenson reminded Ms. Keyes that TOLD Development has offered to <br />, ::� <br />�rade the deuelopment site in an effort to alleviate water problems occuring in the adjacent <br />:: <br />fJZO�ert�es: `'T'his work could be made as a condition of the development agreement. <br />P�.ssociate Ericson infonned the Commission that this item would be on the April 1 agenda <br />at which time Staff would provide a report which addresses these issues. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.