My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, <br />1 <br />i: . <br />Mounds �I�evv Plar��i�� Commiss�on Apwdl 1, 199� <br />I�egui��° 1Vi�e�ira� P��e 7 <br />that the citize�s safety concems had not b�en apprapriately addressed. <br />Cl�aer°pea°so� Pe#ea°son closed the pubGc hearing and returned tt�e floor to the <br />Comenission for questions and comrnents. <br />Coan�assio�eer John�ton, again, stated his concern ��he la <br />for the proj ect. He said he would have a hard time ,< :< far <br />IVinDOT is not behind the designed access point. <br />Corrier�iss'�ners Stevereson9 Brasaerreleq anc� £ <br />wouId noi be in favor of going against MnDOT <br />Cor�xr�a��sioa�er ��°�saernl� told the Commi <br />aa <br />paying commercial devetopments. If the Ci <br />resid�ntial tax rates wili continue to increas� <br />ion lane <br />xnr� that <br />"revv is in need of tax- <br />i�:s� is not expanded the <br />;.y <br />1V��-. Jot�nsoa� stated the message th '� em� ���;��r,,th� ������ the Comprehensive <br />r�,,,...,.:;,.; . . �, <br />Pian Update community forurns w at Hi a�;"�:�����t,�;: �' oniy location that <br />.r i:.:;::a><::..«...::::y..:i . <br />,�... .,:.V• �.. �.��i�i� <br />commercial development is wel�a e. If o}ec� 1�:��� considered along IIighway 10, <br />the R-1 prop�rty that abuts opose. � roject s�ld be rezoned to R-2 or R-3 to <br />buffer ihe R-1 areas from t:�� rnmer, develop ° nt, <br />it wo� <br />projec. <br />issioraea° � <br />�sseo��� <br />far <br />an increase in their commercial tax <br />Waigreen project was close enough to Highway 10 that <br />�ion into the residential area abutting the praposed <br />agceed with the citizens that ihe R-1 area needs a bigger buffer <br />�o�n�dssaoner�, s ber°t stated the City could run the risk of developing the reputation of <br />b�ing urifrie�,,.� ta developers by requiring the purchase af buffer property to go along <br />�:uzth a ��i��i�roieci. <br />�����=���son P��erson stated the City needs to develop a"downtown feel." Currently, <br />most services that ihe Mounds View citizens require are found outside of the City. He <br />s�aggested it is Yirne to bring those services intio the immediate �rea and develop that <br />"downtown feel." <br />He asiked his fetlow Commissioners i� a�s�ec the foilowing question: Is the use of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.