My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />May 6, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />There was a problem in that the parking areas were shown to be at the property line <br />instead of set back by the required ten feet. The existing parking lot setback along the <br />western property line is five feet. There is a potential problem in that vehicles parking <br />near the property line would extend to far over the property line encroachinnto the <br />neighboring <br />g g <br />Staff recommended redrawing the site plan to show 4 degree£ -,z arking around the <br />'c <br />proposed addition, which would allow for the cont ation oft ve- > , rking lot <br />setback from the property lines and the addition of as five -foo sidewal ; l e <br />perimeter of the building and show concrete cure: d gutte along then ' � w E <br />nA €` <br />Staff recommended the Planning Commission appt janning Commission Resolution <br />No 545 -98, a resolution recommending to the City �roval of the development <br />review as requested by Mermaid Inc., with stipulations. umw <br />Commissioner Miller questioned the f <br />operate in the B -3 zone. <br />d the bowling alley to <br />Director Jopke told the Commi on the City, at an a > •eriod of time, allowed, <br />without discussion and considg'tion ofYnging thcode, the bowling alley to operate. <br />He added it would not be .i riate aft his time &deny the expansion because it has <br />existed there with no prob errs. Sta e } recornr ding the Code be amended to allow a <br />bowling alley in thgd3art <br />sinner Stew s_,_ <br />of 'the �p ng wo <br />ley patrons t <br />bowfin' <br />Chaiipersoit <br />maintained. <br />ated his main concern is the parking issue. The fact that all <br />d,fi re perimeter of the lot, would make it necessary for the <br />ttrler to get to the bowling facility. <br />tatedthe five -foot parking setback from the property lines should <br />Commissioner Kilter questioned snow storage. <br />Dan Hall, fo Mermaid Inc., told the Commission he does the snow plowing for the <br />cility apAliere is room available on the existing site for snow storage. <br />missioner Miller stated because of the allowed use of amusement centers in a B -3 <br />zone it made sense to reconsider allowing a bowling alley as one of the permitted uses in a <br />B -3 zone. <br />Commissioner Miller questioned the outdoor lighting requirements for the building. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.