My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />July 15, 1998 <br />All Planning Commission Members acknowledged receipt of the City's current <br />Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map. <br />Page 2 <br />Jopke told the Commission the Maps' color designations had bee ple ted by the I® <br />35W Corridor Coalition in an attempt to standardize 1. d use d`'''='across the <br />corridor. This process was intended to simplify the ilea: uni s between all of <br />the communities that are members of the "Coaliti . e sugg �� City of <br />Mounds View return to its original approach of , gratings . erti1q':, to <br />instead of density, as had been done on the Map � 4 are t ommissio <br />The Land Use Map and the Zoning Map were co <br />bring out any inconsistencies that exist between t <br />perspective, it was determined that the Highwa <br />most attention and analysis as to how the av <br />ne another in an attempt to <br />From a land use <br />ea that needs the <br />'dor could be used. <br />Jopke asked the Commission to cons $ ,Y �. = . s to 1. use along the Highway <br />p `�:e�» � g g Y <br />10 corridor: <br />1. Should the land be deb; <br />2. Should the land be ith o$. case -bv:_ se basis? <br />Obe stated it was <br />pr ` hat Hig <br />expre <br />co ,01 e, he <br />ensus o <br />ould be <br />eeling <br />Peters <br />ext <br />at participated in the community forum <br />main area of commercial development. The <br />t a... ounty Road I should not be developed for <br />t the development of County Road I depended to a large <br />communities of Shoreview, Blaine, and Arden Hills had <br />their cities. Future development in the cities could impact <br />oad I as a through road to their cities. <br />hat the planning that is taking place by the City of Mounds View on the <br />Ian Update is a blueprint for the future. If the Planning Commission <br />esignate the remaining residential properties along Highway 10 or County <br />usiness use, it would not mean that the home owners were being asked to <br />from their homes. The redesignation would only go into affect if and when the <br />property changed ownership, he added. <br />Peterson suggested that the City make a strong effort to change the Zoning Map to reflect <br />the Comprehensive Land Use Map, particularly on the Highway 10 properties which are <br />"grossly out of sync." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.