My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />July 15, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />Brasaemle expressed concern in regards to the tax implications that the people, whose <br />property is now zoned residential, would be faced with if their zoning was changed to <br />business use. The property tax would be based on a higher valued commer;;°t use rather <br />than a lower valued residential use. <br />Miller suggested safeguarding the current residents <br />corridor. This would allow the City to rezone th <br />development as business or commercial. <br />way 10 <br />e and <br />Peterson suggested establishing a 285 feet plus - e" one on either si y way <br />10 as the commercial corridor. The corridor wou <br />10 to the west end of Highway 10, he added. <br />Miller expressed concern in regards to co <br />H2, especially with the resistance that is <br />A lengthy discussion ensued in w <br />proposed 285 foot setback on t <br />east/west length of the high <br />basis of their designation p <br />property next to the Eve <br />High . ay 10 corrido <br />A , <br />Tie desi <br />geste <br />om the east end of Highway <br />riangu <br />ercial d <br />strial, Li <br />g the <br />res <br />Terrac <br />sst <br />'th <br />B. Pia <br />h of County Road <br />development. <br />Members drew in their <br />ghway 10, going the full <br />prehensive Land Use Map for the <br />ested that the last piece of residential <br />erty needed to be included in the <br />e also recommended that Town's Edge <br />rial/Warehouse, or Mixed -Use PUD. <br />own's Edge Terrace property as HC/IND PUD. The <br />he designation of HC /IND PUD for the Town's Edge <br />Vacancy and Terms (Verbal Report) <br />ff' opke told the C <br />potential Commit <br />discussed. In ' <br />order to giv <br />e list o <br />yin <br />on that City staff had received, and subsequently Iost, a list of <br />on candidates that would be added to the list that had already been <br />of this fact, the selection of a candidate would have to be tabled in <br />y staff the time it needs to locate the missing list and add these names to <br />idates being considered by the City to fill the vacancy on the planning <br />Obert suggested that all applicants that are considered for the vacancy should be <br />interviewed by the Planning Commission, including Liaison Koopmeiners, prior to <br />selection by the Mayor and approval of the selection by City Council. The Commission <br />unanimously agreed with Obert's suggestion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.