My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />August 19, 1998 <br />Page 6 <br />Peterson asked the applicant how they intended to meet staffs recommendation that the east side <br />drive have a minimum ten -foot setback. <br />John Trumble, Setter Leech and Lindstrom, project architects, stated <br />zero setback, as requested in the development review, was fel to be th <br />the facilities operation and requested the Commission to co99 p this <br />of its vi <br />ated the <br />only. SYSCO has calculated dimensions needed for the s <br />truck drivers and the dimensions requested on the plan i <br />achieve these safety dimensions. <br />thy' 0 -foo <br />fir. , <br />e <br />rive aisle and <br />c situation for <br />this request <br />ees, and <br />ne <br />Obert suggested a container wall on the east side drivew' that no pollutants entered <br />into the wetland from the SYSCO facility. <br />Mr. Trumble stated there were aesthetic issues as operation � hat would not allow <br />this type of structure. <br />Miller asked how many new employees w be ad s planned expansion. <br />Mr. Trumble stated an additional l ople, 450 t.< 50, would be added as a result of the <br />expansion. <br />Stevenson st ted he would <br />recomme $ �'� staff to <br />drivewa a�g . t are <br />drivers. <br />stipulation requiring a ten -foot setback as <br />s dimensional requests (50- foot - access- <br />safety needs of SYSCO's visitor, employees, and truck <br />Brasaemle as <br />requireme <br />Mr°. <br />storage would be and if the original PUD had <br />ces are sacrificed so that snow storage can be accommodated. <br />specific requirement in the PUD for snow storage other than the issue <br />be stated by the developer. <br />the recourse would be for a property owner pushing snow into a protected <br />Jopke stated it would be an issue for the City's Code enforcement and the violation would subject <br />the perpetrator to fines. <br />MOTION /SECOND: Obert/Brasaemle to approve Resolution No. 555 -98, a Resolution <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.