My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />August 19, 1998 <br />Page 7 <br />Recommending Approval of a Development Review Request by SYSCO FOODS, striking the <br />reference to the ten -foot setback requirement in the first stipulation of the Resolution. <br />Chairperson Peterson opened the floor for discussion of the motion. <br />Ericson stated a lighting plan had not been submitted. Th- ;:'cant' " .squired to submit <br />a lighting plan for review before any permits were issued <br />VOTE: Ayes - 6 Nays - 0 <br />Motion carried <br />7. Staff Reports/Information Items <br />It was the consensus of the Commission to mov <br />Bowling Center Expansion, to the Agenda Se <br />A. Discussion Regarding Compre <br />Jopke asked the Commission to c <br />Work Sessions" for the Compre rvive Pl." date P =ss. <br />It was the <br />meeting <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />sus of t <br />Septem <br />Octobe <br />No em <br />.er't <br />Hall <br />Hall <br />e to le announced <br />B. i iscussion Reg <br />Members <br />arding Mermaid <br />re dates and times for "Special <br />e following dates and times for these <br />ecommendation to Expand Planning Commission to Nine <br />told the Coinnaission that the City Council had asked the Planning Commission for a <br />. ndatio ding the possibility expanding the Planning Commission to its allowable <br />main 6 embers to allow more participation. <br />It was the consensus of the Commission that the Commission membership should remain at seven <br />people. An increased number of people on the Commission was viewed as being nonproductive <br />and could affect attendance at Planning Commission meetings. <br />Ericson told the Commission a that the Council would be informed of the Commission's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.