My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2018 10:25:19 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 8:14:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
882
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
: . _- _ - —.._, � - - - <br />__ � - . ...- . - . : . . _ <br />_ __ _ . <br />, .: . : . : _ _... � < ___�._ .- - - -----=-� - -=.. -- _� � : <br />--- � -=' - - -� ------_----- — - --- _ <br />We have discussed with the abutting property owners the possibility of including the drainage of <br />their properties as part of our storm water detention system that wiIl be constructed and maintained <br />on-site. Presently, each one of the homes, to a differing degree, experiences water build-up in their <br />yards and/or basements during periods of heavy rain. Therefore, through the construction and <br />development of this project, we can bring a positive benefit to the immediately abutting neighbors. <br />FinalIy, to address concerns of value, we have discussed with the neighbors whether they would wish <br />to have a portion of the buffer deeded to them to enlar�e their properties. Presently, there is a mixed <br />feeling among the neighbors as to whether that is desirable. Of course, they do not wish to have their <br />property values increase through the additional property resulting i.n additional property taxes <br />payable. Therefore, perhaps the most appropriate course is to have us retain ownership and create <br />an easement of some sort. <br />Characte�- of Sun-ounding AYea <br />We do not feel that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment would si�ificantly alter the character of <br />the surrounding area. Three of the four corners at the intersection of County Road I and Highway <br />10 are presently developed as retail uses. These uses vary in intensity from neighborhood centers <br />and strip malls, to fast food developments and stand alone retail buildings. None of tk�e existi.ng <br />improvements feature the level of green space and buffering contemplated by our proposed <br />development. <br />Immediately surrounding this proposed development, is a single-family residential neighborhood of <br />generally well kept and owner occupied homes. To the north are the Red Oak Apartments and the <br />planned additional multi-fannily development to the north. <br />I�efnonsty°ated Need for ChanPe an Desa�°Qnat�on <br />The neighbors were seemingly overwhelming in their opposition to tiie recently contemplated <br />development multi-family housing on the City owned parcel located at County Road I, Highway 10 <br />and Eastwood Drive. A number of issues were discussed in public forum, including the safety of the <br />-�- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.