My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
1996 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2012 12:29:23 PM
Creation date
2/23/2012 11:56:41 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
477
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Plannin� Commission -`��, <br />Plannin� Case No. 460.9b: 2975 Higiaway 10 <br />4ctober 9, 1996 <br />P�ge 4 <br />recommend ihe p1a�i�ng of irees and/or shr�abs as a requiremer�t oithe conditionai use <br />pernut. <br />I��gh#i�g and �igna�e <br />g. The lighiing shall be accomplished in such a way as io have no direct source of light visibie <br />froen adjacent land in residential use or frotn the public right-of-wa� and shall be in <br />compliance with Section 1103.09 of this Tikle. <br />• lighting arranged to deflect light away from adjoining residential zone or from <br />puhlic streets <br />e hooded or controlled so as not to light adjacent property <br />• light cast on public street shall not exceed 1 foot-candIe; on residential property <br />shall not exceed 0.4 foot candle. <br />Each light standard island and all islands in the pazking lot shall ba landscaped or covered. <br />m. All signing and informationai or visual cornmunication devices shall be rninimized and shall <br />be in compliance with the Mounds View Sign. Code. . <br />There are three existing light standards in the parking lot which are in poor repair, and two <br />of them are located in the parking Iot rather than in landscaped islands. Because they are <br />not in use, staffwas unable to tell if they create glare onto adjacent properties. Given that <br />this is an existing site with light standards in place, staff is seeking guidanc� from the <br />Pianning Commission as to how much fik�e applicani is expected to do to meet these <br />criteria. In order to meet the criteria, the luminaires on the light standards may need to be <br />replaced and landscaped islands created . Staff needs photometric readings for the <br />e�sting light. standards io determine if they meet the limits on foot candles noted above. <br />The applicant is proposing to use a sign package provided by the "parent" campany. Staff <br />is recomrnending the appiicant provide information on signage prior to the Planning <br />Com.mission's next meeting. Signage is limited to a total area of 100 square feet, <br />including'any ground or waIl signs. , <br />I)a°�ina�e <br />e. A dr�inage system, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works/Cii.y Engineer, <br />shall be instaiied. • <br />The Ciiy Engineer has reviewed the proposaI and has noted that the drainage will �o to <br />the ditch along the �-Iighway 10 right-of-way. They ha,ve advised that the case be referred <br />io MnDOT and the Rice Creek V�afiershed District to verify that they do not have any <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.