Laserfiche WebLink
�ounds Vievd Planrurag Cor�ssion <br />Regular Meetu°�� <br />5epternber 4, 199b <br />Page 12 <br />IVIi°.17iem has mentioned ihat a 12 foo� driv� is acceptcable if°ihc <br />bualding is pravided r�riih a spaYnkier systerr�. �rie would lilce this <br />inf'ormation verified. <br />Mr. Diem stated he would a.iso like the Fire 1Vlarshail to verify <br />that ihe width of the driee aisle �s really not an issue if ihe <br />farthest pa.r� af the building is within 150 feet of a fire hydrant. <br />He siated th�y would also be willi�� ta provide a siamese hydraa�t <br />in the com�r. <br />Barb Croues, 2�'�5 County I�oad F�, asked aboui snow <br />rernovai and stated her concem that storage of it on the <br />site would a�eci the nuinber of par�Cing. spa�es available. <br />I�ir. Diem sta�ed if this wa,� an issue, tchey would have st <br />removed from ihe site. <br />Commissioner Miller stated she would like to l�ow if twio <br />parking spaces are removed on the north side, could the <br />remainder be mad� into pazallel parkin� spaces? <br />Chair Peterson stated he fee�s the main canc�m i� ihe size of <br />the lot for the praposed use, however many oiher i�sues of <br />concem have been addressed as welt. Overall, he wouid admii <br />that the revis�d proposal is much more acceptable ti�an beFore. <br />A discussion aros� as to whether the Comrnissioners would Iike to <br />see two different plans at th� next meeting: one takirig into <br />account a five fooi variance and one witho�at ihe variance. <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated he really could not see <br />a reason to submit � pl�n wiih a variance, however the <br />choice is the applicant's. <br />IVi ti�_.�on/Secp�. N�iller/Johnsion to table the request <br />for the IVew Apostolic Churcia �antil the September I�, <br />1996 meeting. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />(Brooks was eaccused frorri ihe meetirig) <br />�otion Carried <br /><:1 <br />