Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />- -:-.;'J <br />_1 <br />Mounds V��vv Plar�n� Comrrr�ssiora <br />itegular 1�/leetixig <br />�ep�ember 4, i 996 <br />Page 13 <br />Tils. 3h�Idon noied that she had rec�iv�d �, request <br />from � resident for a change to ihc city'S zoning code. <br />This request pergair►s ta parking lot s�tbacks between <br />residential and non�re�idential uses. <br />7. �'lanning Case �%. <br />SP-00�-96 <br />ivfr. Mooa has requesied ihai a provision be added �c� ihe <br />code tha� would requi�e thai where ihere is non-residential <br />uses ia' a residential district, the paridng iot associated vaith <br />thase uses b� at least 15 feet from #he property line and <br />that the area be rxsed for landscap�ng aaid buffering. Nls. 3heldott <br />x�oted thai on� must also take inta �onsideration how a change su�h <br />as this would affect exisiin� churches. It appears that most of �he <br />e�cistin� church�s would meei the 15 foot proposed requirem�nt. <br />'�'he Planning Commissi�n must detemiine whether it should <br />be fifteen feet o� more than �fteen feei. 3he wo�d <br />recomrnend that it be based somevahat on �he siz� of ihe <br />site and that an ailowance be mad� for existin� pa.ricin� <br />lots to remain but if ih�y are ever recor�structed, <br />they would need to be brought into can#'orrnance. <br />Ms. Sheldon noted that code allows arry property owner <br />in Mounds View to uutiate an amendment. Another <br />issue thai the Commissior�ers may want to look at also <br />deals with zninimutt� lot size required far these types <br />of faciliiies. <br />Com�nissioner �iiller staied she would like to discuss ihe <br />changes iurther �d wou(d also like to see what impact <br />a chaxig� like iius wouid have on existing buildings and <br />schoois. <br />Comrnissioner �tevenson stated he woutd like a survey <br />completed to see what oiher cities' ordinar�ces are <br />with regard to setbacks. <br />NIs_ Sheldon stated she ha� pr�pared an 4rci�nance and Resolutior� <br />in regazd to the requested am�ndm�r�ts for ihe Commission�rs' <br />consideraiion_ She nated th�t part of th� reason she wanted to <br />pr�s�nt this infarmatior� at t�s time is that it does have som� <br />relationship to the other case �nd sta.ff did not want to preve�� it <br />from movin� forward. Discussion or� this car� b� sch�duled info <br />