Laserfiche WebLink
�`i � _ _ �� � ��. . �, <br />1R ::. � .... a ' �- �, <br />i � ��� <br />� ! ' <br />�an Moon, 6929 Pieasant 1/iew �rive, <br />r�ferer�ced anather particular prop�rty tha� i�e <br />ch�arch �ad been looking a4. Th� applicant <br />ie�dicafed this pariicular property had an <br />easement running fihre��agh it whicFt w�uld noi <br />m�ke ifi a desirable site for 4he churc#�. <br />Steve �order�, 3009 County Road H, indicated <br />thai he is avvare �f land av�iiable on Highw�y <br />10, or� boih sides, �hat may be better sui#�d. <br />°The applicant expl�ir�ed fihat the abiii#y fo�° a <br />ch�rch to build in a r�sidential disirict has been <br />profiect�d. He al�� explainecf that other <br />pr�perties ihaf fhey htad looked at did not Ftave <br />sewer a�d water to fihe site wi�ich would �ost <br />mor� to insfiall than the !o� itseifi. <br />Lyie Bellis, 2977 County Road H, rneniioned <br />thafi a developer (Steve �ord�n af this time <br />indicated tha� fhe deveioper was Larry Beach <br />and that he was #old by Mr. Beach 4hat hi� _ <br />name could be used at this meefing) tried to <br />develop th� property with no �ooperation from <br />the City. Pfanning Associate Pruitt responded <br />by indicating that she h�s not been approached <br />by Mr. Beach regarding development of this <br />site. <br />Comrr�issioner �rooks asked wheiher or r�ot <br />church r�presentatives are aware of <br />neighbaring property owr�er�' objectio� to this <br />proposai. Mr. Diem expfained that, in his <br />experience, the d�velapment af schoois and <br />ch�srches i� �iway� oppos�d. He #urther <br />explained fhafi typic�lly commercial <br />d�ve�opmenfi doesn'fi create a� rriuch <br />c�ntroversy since thase properties are afready <br />zoned for thai partic�a(�r use. <br />�, � _ .� .• � - _ N <br />- r � - 1�: � + s � �- • <br />