Laserfiche WebLink
Ii�n�. 6 <br />r ;�: , : f � �; ; ...,, <br />\ ' �' <br />1% :;. < �; '=, <br />1@�ee��r�� ��t�o <br />�taf�° R�pm� by: <br />Pla�r�ing Case Nooa <br />�t�quest: <br />P�ietione�°: <br />I.oca�ioaa: <br />,` �� ��- �� <br />Zore�n�,and �7seo <br />A�Spiicable Regutat�or�so <br />August 20, 1997 <br />James Ericson, Piar�in� Associate <br />500-97 <br />Dev�lopment Review for McDonalds Reconsiruction <br />Gary Meyer, Project Manager for i�cDonalds <br />2201 Highway 10 <br />0$-30-23m44-OOQ4 <br />B-3, �i�hway Business I�istrict / McDonalds RestauF�r�t <br />� I�eveioprne�at IgevYevvo Section 100b.06 requires that a11 commercial and °uidu���ria� <br />devetopmer�t within the City be subject to review by the Planning Commission an� <br />approval by ihe City Council. <br />• Sei�acicso 5ection 1104,01, as amended by Ordinance No. 590, establishes th� �����k�,a.I <br />building and parking Iot setbacks. These will be addressed in the anaiysis section of this <br />report. <br />• Pari�in� I�equi�°ea�er�is: Section I 12 i.13 requires that 53 parking spaces b� pr��e���; %r <br />a use with 1,500 square feet af dining area and 1,00� square feet of kitchen sp�c�. <br />Attachmea�ts: <br />PIanning Application <br />Zoning IVTap <br />Memo from Rocky Keehn, City Engineer, dated 8/7/97 <br />Memo from Nlaric Bishop, Fire Marshal, dated 8/7/97 <br />Letter from Sunde Land S�rveyin�, Inc., dated 7/12/97 <br />Revised Plans, dated 8/14/97 <br />Plaruvng Commission Resolutaon 527-97 <br />�ackgrourad, <br />`Th� applicant, Gary Meyer, is proposing to demolish �he existing 1VIcDonalds reseaurant located at <br />2201 1�Ii�hway I O and replace it with � similarly sized restaurant moved approximately 30 feet more <br />toward the center of the loi. Mr°. Meyer has indicated the existing restaurant, which was buili in <br />1974, no ionger meefs the company's current needs in ierrns of building iayout and fur�c�ior�. �or� <br />specifically, the kitchen area is ]�ecoming increasingly incompatible with the current met�a� c�#���i���, <br />P� playland has been discussed far this lo�ation for which adequate rooz� is avail�b��p h���ve�- it i� <br />not part of ti�e currertt plans. <br />