My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
1997 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2018 4:33:48 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 3:06:30 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Apr-li-�7 09e�9A How�rd Sh�ldon yo7��m��g.=���� �e(�� <br />-� <br />Plarir�in� Commission <br />471-9'7: O'N�il Pro�erty <br />April 10q 1997 <br />Page 2 <br />{4) Th� characier af th� surzoundin� area. <br />(5) `I'he demonst�aYed need for the use. <br />Chapter 1 i20 stai�s thc purpose �d intent af allo��g �'�� �,p����;; ����� ������;��y����, <br />�nd the pracedur� for approva.i �f plann�d unit developm�n�s (Ftil)s). <br />���k�round: <br />This appiication was discuss�d by th� F'lannin� C�mmisslo� r�n A��°ch g9 and April 29 �ri�h <br />public testirnony tak�n at both �f thes� hearings. At the April 2 rrr�t�ng, ehe Planning <br />Comr�ission reviewed the issu�s listed in ihe siaf'f repori �s s�ill needin� di�.���EC�m.,. /� ���f <br />summary of th� discussion is n�t�d below: <br />* C'omp�eliens�ve Pl�r� ,4�iiendrneni: Plannin� Comr�ission m�t�tbe�s ���� t�3�� �� ��r���g <br />desigr�aiion was vid, a�nd n�de.� to be reeva�uat�, �iven ih�t f�a� c���i€�rE ��:c};z,����� ��D.��; <br />r�ra� adopted in 1979 and subsequent efforts to atnend it ��d I���:��; �� �,€��� c;;r�,�.�,1� {'r�z, <br />this property. <br />� �'r�f,/ic a�� Acress: Planr�in� Commissio� members felt that th�y ���' �� ��� �om <br />th� revised Eraffic study before coming to ariy definite concIusz�e�� �� ���; Sg���a ��7is <br />study wa� not available for the April 2 meedng but will be avaiIabl� for the April 16 <br />meeiing. The preference of Commission m�mbers was for the re-alz�����i ���dgewo�d <br />and a full-movemen�, signalized inters�ctiort where Esi��w� a�� �� d��,���� ���� <br />to this project wvuld be aligned. It was recogniz,�d, $o�rever, that �s dat�, ��5� }��s <br />not been witling to a�low a fuIl movement intersection ar khe addition csf � t�ffic �g�na,i <br />beh�een L.ang Lake Road and County Road �I2. <br />* P�rki��. The generaP cansensus after some discussion wa� �o tas� th� �g�°� �.���� ��g��y <br />of 1 spac� for every 4 seats as th� parIang r�uirem�nt far this projcct, witlz a <br />requirement that the applicant show proof of parking for 7C�0 spaces. `T'h� c�attaent ratiQ <br />would result in 662 par�ng spaces bein� requized. <br />* �r� f'f'er �rea �long Cau� t4o� tI2: 'Th� sug�estio� wa.s mad� that the fin�1 desi�� of <br />this area b� settled at the d��v�lopm�nt plan sfiage. '�hre.� �ptions hav� b�� pres�e�t�d by <br />th� �ppiic�nt: <br />(I} leavin� th� woods �s is <br />(2) 2eav�ng the wovds and adding additior�al c��y using cor�ferc�ea� ��;��;�p �g �3� <br />north edge of th� bu�fer ax�a to �etter s�reen th� of�ic� bualdir�gs and f�nc� in <br />winYer months <br />(�) removfn� the e�asYin� tree.s and repIacar�� ther� with b��nin� �a� a��� �������d <br />Iandscaping <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.