Laserfiche WebLink
1Vlounds Viee�v Pl�n.z�ing Corrr�n�iss�o� <br />Regu�a�° Meeting <br />Feb�-uar� 21, 2001 � <br />Page 4 <br />Commissioner Johnson asked staff to check with the City of Fridley to see how it regulates. <br />beacons and searchlights. <br />Commissioner Kaden aslced how the City would determine how fast the Iight is;flashing. <br />Director Ericson stated the Code defines a flashing sign and <br />Director Ericso� stated the Code has increased signage all <br />signs to accammodate �he square signs with wheels and n+ <br />would require that the sigx� copy stay within the 48 square <br />Commissioner Hegland asked Staff to verify the sign di; <br />He then aslced how the Code would handle an inflatable <br />Director Ericson stated a permit is required to put <br />Direc#or Ezicson stated he had received con <br />temporary signs to three times a year for 21 <br />signage for businesses. <br />Con�missioner Hegland asked if <br />issue is the number of occurrenc� <br />Director <br />or the nt <br />ga befoze <br />Director <br />in favor, <br />stated he wa`s not'Sure if <br />occurrences, or the fact 1 <br />�linson stated h.e b'elieved <br />1 to i�eceive authorizatio'r <br />at a <br />;�ect for a <br />a <br />to 48 square feet for <br />:ters. Tkus provision <br />xea of the sign. <br />ign rentai companies. <br />dYertisin� on it. <br />�nity that limiting <br />enaugh temporary <br />sign is the issue or if the <br />�mmunity fiakes issue with the duration <br />even required. <br />the business communi#y was concerned far having to <br />for a permit for a temporary sign. <br />e-mail fro�n the Chief of Police stating he was 100% <br />signage in the interest of public safety. <br />�iz Stevenson stated he is coricerned far allowing signs above seven {7) feet noting he thinlcs <br />Code should allow for.`sigris above seven (7) feet but no signage between foux (4) and seven <br />feei. It was the consent of the Commission io direct Staff to change the Code to require no <br />iage between four'(4) and seven {7} feet but allow signage above seven (7) feet. <br />he would malce the changes. <br />Director;Ericson stated the Code does not address maintenance of non-conforming signs. As <br />drafted it is a statement that says if anything is done to the sign it needs to be brought into <br />compliance. He then questioned if the Commission wished to change the language in the Code. <br />, ,; <br />Chair Stevenson suggested Staff provide an example of model language io cover the ., <br />maintenance of non-conforming signs. ' <br />