My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
't <br /><l <br />1Vlot�nds V�evv Pla�ning Commfssio�. <br />Reg�tlar Ii�leeting <br />Februar°y 21, �Q01 <br />Page 3 <br />Chair Stevenson stated he felt the need to revise the part of the code to allow advertising <br />information and suggested eliminating the first provision in that section. <br />Director Ericson asked how the Cammission wanted to measure the sigh� triangle noting same <br />cities measure from the curb lizze rather than the property line so this allows the;sign to be <br />brought in n�uch closer. He indicated Mounds View's Code does state from tli� property line. <br />Commissioner Kaden suggested adding a statement for a <br />property owners take the rislc and may have to move the <br />Director Ericson stated that would pose a problem in that o <br />is widened the sigti becomes non-confoz-�ning and would cc <br />Director Ericson statad he would rather Ieave the Code the: <br />Director Ericson staied he would review the Code <br />goveming the control of signs with obscene langu <br />Commissioner Kaden questioned how the <br />Director Ericson stated ihe City <br />construction. <br />Director Ericson explained an obsolete sign <br />that goes along with the abai�zdai�ed sign lan <br />to remove a sign that is no longer �alid. <br />Director`Ericson asked what the Commissic <br />would be allowed. <br />of <br />the streets are ever <br />has a sign and the str� <br />allowed the way it is. <br />attorney to see if the language <br />i or prol�il�ited by law. <br />the size and type of <br />be removed or covered indicating <br />age gives the City the opportunity <br />thought of the graphic illustraiing where signage <br />It was the consent of•the Corz�mission �hat the graphic praperly illustrated the restnictions fo� <br />, <br />Corrvmissioner Hegland asked Dlrector Ericson to add righY-of-way information to the grraphic to <br />ciarify. <br />Director Ericson stated the temporary sign section has been completely rewritten from the <br />previous Code and stated he was hoping for business community input at this meeting. He noted <br />this was an attempt `to section out the types af signage far individual requirements. <br />DiirectorEricsan questioned whether the Commission wished to iimit the time for allowing a <br />searclalight. <br />It was the Consent ofthe Commission to require a permit issued by Council for beacons and <br />searchlights. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.